Massachusetts School and District Profiles

South Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - South Elementary
Organization Information
District:Andover (00090000)School type:Elementary School
School:South Elementary (00090020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95, Target = 96.4CPI = 95, Target = 96.4CPI = 95, Target = 96.4 93.9 95.5 95.0 -0.5 96.4 97.0 94260100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 89.7 82.3 87.5 86.1 -1.4 89.7 91.2 907075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.6, Target = 89.2CPI = 81.6, Target = 89.2CPI = 81.6, Target = 89.2 81.5 86.5 81.6 -4.9 89.2 90.8 914975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 98.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 98.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 98.5, Target = 96.7 95.1 98.7 98.5 -0.2 96.7 97.6 9451100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6 94.1 94.8 94.2 -0.6 96.6 97.1 86193100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.3, Target = 96.6CPI = 89.3, Target = 96.6CPI = 89.3, Target = 96.6 94.1 90.8 89.3 -1.5 96.6 97.1 6726025No Change
High needsCPI = 72.9, Target = 91.7CPI = 72.9, Target = 91.7CPI = 72.9, Target = 91.7 85.8 76.0 72.9 -3.1 91.7 92.9 36700Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 67.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 67.9, Target = 91.1 84.8 71.5 67.9 -3.6 91.1 92.4 60490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 98, Target = 99.1CPI = 98, Target = 99.1CPI = 98, Target = 99.1 98.6 98.2 98.0 -0.2 99.1 99.3 7651100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 96.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 96.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 96.4 93.9 89.4 86.9 -2.5 96.4 97.0 4319325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 95.4CPI = 84.9, Target = 95.4CPI = 84.9, Target = 95.4 92.1 92.7 84.9 -7.8 95.4 96.1 64910Declined
High needs  86.5---- 93.3-28--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  86.3---- 93.2-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.2, Target = 95.2CPI = 82.2, Target = 95.2CPI = 82.2, Target = 95.2 91.7 91.8 82.2 -9.6 95.2 95.9 36690Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.3 26.52600 1.0 0.826025
High needs 4.2 7.17025 2.8 2.9700
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0490 2.0 4.1490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 49.1 41.2510 0.0 0.05125
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 22.7 23.31930 1.4 1.019325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 43.2 46.22600 2.8 3.52600
High needs 17.8 20.07025 9.6 11.4700
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 4.0 8.24925 12.0 14.3490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 78.9 80.4510 0.0 0.05125
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 34.4 37.81930 3.3 4.71930
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.8 18.7910 1.9 3.3910
High needs--28---28-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.5 13.0690 2.6 4.3690
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 58.0 44.0 -14.0 51.0No17650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 53.0 37.0 -16.0 51.0No5025Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 61.5 38.0 -23.5 51.0No3625Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 79.0 64.0 -15.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 51.0 40.5 -10.5 51.0No13450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 60.5 41.0 -19.5 51.0No17750Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 48.5 33.0 -15.5 51.0No5125Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 46.0 34.5 -11.5 51.0No3625Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 77.0 59.0 -18.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 52.0 39.0 -13.0 51.0No13525Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students266265100Yes266265100Yes9595100Yes
High needs727199Yes727199Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---10---
EL and Former EL12---12---2---
Students w/ disabilities504998Yes504998Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian5252100Yes5252100Yes17---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino11---11---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White19819799Yes19819799Yes7373100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles