Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James Clark School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - James Clark School
Organization Information
District:Agawam (00050000)School type:Elementary School
School:James Clark School (00050030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.3, Target = 89.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 82.3, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher All Students 81.8 86.6 82.3 -4.3 89.4 90.9 341200Declined
High needsCPI = 71.2, Target = 86.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.2, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher High needs 76.2 75.5 71.2 -4.3 86.1 88.1 29590Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 78.8 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75.6, Target = 78.8 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 76.9 76.9 75.6 -1.3 78.8 88.5 444325No Change
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.4, Target = 89.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.4, Target = 89.3 75 or Higher White 81.6 87.1 83.4 -3.7 89.3 90.8 241040Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.9, Target = 91.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.9, Target = 91.3 75 or Higher All Students 85.1 89.2 85.9 -3.3 91.3 92.6 511190Declined
High needsCPI = 74.1, Target = 88.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 74.1, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher High needs 80.3 78.4 74.1 -4.3 88.5 90.2 43580Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.6, Target = 80.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 78.6, Target = 80.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.9 78.9 78.6 -0.3 80.7 89.5 604225No Change
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.6, Target = 91.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.6, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher White 85.5 90.8 87.6 -3.2 91.5 92.8 481030Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.6 12.512025 6.3 11.71200
High needs 3.8 8.55925 17.0 23.7590
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.1 11.64325 17.9 18.6430
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.0 11.510425 5.8 10.61040
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.8 27.71190 7.1 10.11190
High needs 21.2 19.0580 17.3 20.7580
Econ. Disadvantaged 28.9 21.4420 15.8 16.7420
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.4 27.21030 5.0 8.71030
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 54.0 50.0 -4.0 51.0No5750Below Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 49.0 49.0 0.0 51.0No2550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 54.0 49.0 -5.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 63.0 62.5 -0.5 51.0No56100Above Target
High needsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 47.0 41.5 -5.5 51.0No2450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 65.0 6.0 51.0No48100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 48.0 60.025.000
High needs 48.0 60.025.000
EL and Former EL- 60.025.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12211796Yes12112099Yes----
High needs605596Yes595898Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged444095Yes434298Yes----
EL and Former EL17---17-------
Students w/ disabilities24---24-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino11---11-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White10610195Yes10510499Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles