Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Abington High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Abington High
Organization Information
District:Abington (00010000)School type:High School
School:Abington High (00010505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.8, Target = 97.9CPI = 98.8, Target = 97.9 96.4 97.8 98.8 1.0 97.9 98.2 64124100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.3, Target = 95CPI = 96.3, Target = 95CPI = 96.3, Target = 95 91.4 94.0 96.3 2.3 95.0 95.7 6241100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  94.8---- 97.4-30--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.8, Target = 97.7CPI = 99.8, Target = 97.7CPI = 99.8, Target = 97.7 96.1 97.8 99.8 2.0 97.7 98.1 87106100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 94.2, Target = 93.9 89.6 95.0 94.2 -0.8 93.9 94.8 6112575On Target
High needsCPI = 89.9, Target = 83.4CPI = 89.9, Target = 83.4CPI = 89.9, Target = 83.4 71.6 89.3 89.9 0.6 83.4 85.8 8242100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  90.2---- 95.1-31--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 94.3CPI = 96, Target = 94.3CPI = 96, Target = 94.3 90.3 94.9 96.0 1.1 94.3 95.2 65107100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 95.2 91.7 92.4 92.5 0.1 95.2 95.9 5311650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 89.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 89.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 89.2, Target = 87.6 78.7- 89.2 9.4 87.6 89.4 7737100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------27--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.2 91.7 92.9 92.8 -0.1 95.2 95.9 4010125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 53.8 48.41240 0.0 0.81240
High needs 31.0 22.0410 0.0 2.4410
Econ. Disadvantaged--30---30-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 54.4 51.91060 0.0 0.010625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 51.1 58.412525 1.1 2.41250
High needs 39.3 40.5420 3.6 4.8420
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 53.2 61.710725 1.3 0.910725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.5 20.71160 0.0 1.71160
High needs 9.7 8.1370 6.5 5.43725
Econ. Disadvantaged--27---27-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.9 20.810125 0.0 2.01010
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 49.0 56.0 7.0 51.0Yes11175On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 43.0 53.0 10.0 51.0Yes3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-26--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-0--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 50.5 56.0 5.5 51.0Yes9975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 44.0 52.5 8.5 51.0No11475On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 62.0 53.0 -9.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-28--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0No10075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.4, Target = 80 83.8 92.4 8.6 80.0 90.013275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.4, Target = 80 64.1 88.4 24.3 80.0 90.04375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.08--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 80 83.3 93.4 10.1 80.0 90.012175On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 85 89.4 85.6 -3.8 85.0 95.011175On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 69.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 69.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 69.2, Target = 85 80.0 69.2 -10.8 85.0 95.0390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.020--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 84.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.3, Target = 85 90.0 84.3 -5.7 85.0 95.01020Declined
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.9, Target = 1.3 2.3 2.4 1.9 0.5 1.3 1.23347225No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 5, Target = 4 6.9 4.9 5.0 -0.1 4.0 3.52012125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged  5.1---- 2.6-79--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------35--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.9, Target = 1.2 2.1 2.4 1.9 0.5 1.2 1.12341725No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12612599Yes12612599Yes126126100Yes
High needs434298Yes434298Yes4343100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged323197Yes323197Yes3232100Yes
EL and Former EL5---5---5---
Students w/ disabilities13---13---13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---14---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White10810799Yes10810799Yes108108100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles