Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dover-Sherborn Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Dover-Sherborn Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dover-Sherborn (06550000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Dover-Sherborn Regional High (06550505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
93% - Meeting targets99

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total121247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total8810.00410.0
Weighted total10.510.7-9.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 98%-87%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage93%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total111220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total8810.0
Weighted total10.510.7-
Percentage of possible points 98%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage98%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 99

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 434Exceeded Target
High needs 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1354Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 99.5 0.0 100.0 1634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.0 98.9 0.9 100.0 444Exceeded Target
High needs 97.1 97.6 0.5 99.3 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 96.9 96.7 -0.2 99.9 233Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 99.4 -0.4 100.0 1364Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 99.2 -0.5 100.0 1574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.6 97.2 -1.4 100.0 443Met Target
High needs 98.1 98.3 0.2 100.0 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 97.9 97.8 -0.1 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 99.2 -0.6 100.0 1304Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.4 50.0 1444Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.7 50.0 383Met Target
High needs 68.4 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 71.8 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 67.7 50.0 1194Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.2 50.0 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 65.5 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 71.9 50.0 294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 71.7 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.5 50.0 1224Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 99.4 0.0 100.0 1584Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 97.1 96.7 -0.4 100.0 303Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.3 -0.7 100.0 1444Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 100.0 0.7 100.0 1724Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.8 100.0 3.2 99.6 344Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 95.7 100.0 4.3 99.2 224Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 100.0 0.7 100.0 1444Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6523Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 954Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.2 764Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 40--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 5593Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.9 4.8 0.1 3.9 6714Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 5.4 9.1 -3.7 0.1 440Declined
High needs 15.2 11.5 3.7 12.5 1304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 13.9 10.9 3.0 10.0 922Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 47--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.8 5.1 -0.3 3.5 5644Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.1 99.7 4.6 98.3 3144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 82.1 98.0 15.9 90.1 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 82.1 97.3 15.2 89.6 374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 28--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.8 100.0 4.2 98.8 2634Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 165 16399Yes 1 165 16499Yes 1 165 165100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 32 3097Yes 2 32 3197Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 11---- 11---- 11----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 24 2396Yes 1 24 2396Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 10----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 138 13699Yes 1 138 13799Yes 1 138 138100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles