Massachusetts School and District Profiles

A E Angier

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - A E Angier

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Newton (02070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
A E Angier (02070005)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-34-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total71267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.01410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-4.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 54%-58%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage56%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total4.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 42%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 42

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.7 508.3 -0.4 510.2 2231No Change
Lowest Performing 484.5 489.2 4.7 489.2 333Met Target
High needs 490.6 490.7 0.1 492.2 682Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 488.1 487.9 -0.2 489.8 571No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 513.3 507.0 -6.3 515.4 340Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.1 510.3 0.2 511.7 1563Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.5 505.9 0.4 506.9 2222Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 473.6 476.2 2.6 477.2 332Improved Below Target
High needs 488.8 489.2 0.4 490.5 682Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 483.2 484.5 1.3 485.3 572Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 519.7 515.9 -3.8 522.2 344Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.2 506.7 0.5 507.7 1552Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.0 89.7 1.7 90.4 684Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.2 75.0 -2.2 80.0 211No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.8 92.7 1.9 93.2 484Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.2 50.0 1362Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.9 50.0 332Below Target
High needs 34.4 50.0 401Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 30.8 50.0 341Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.0 50.0 1032Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.4 50.0 1352Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.5 50.0 332Below Target
High needs 41.2 50.0 402Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 41.8 50.0 342Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.0 50.0 1022Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.1 6.2 -1.1 4.0 4060Declined
Lowest Performing 9.1 9.1 0.0 5.5 331No Change
High needs 10.1 9.7 0.4 7.7 1242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 44--
Students w/ disabilities 9.3 8.3 1.0 6.0 842Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 3.8 6.6 -2.8 0.6 610Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.1 6.3 -2.2 2.8 2880Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 230 22899Yes 1 231 22899Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 75 7397Yes 1 75 7397Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 9---- 9---- 2----
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 59 5797Yes 1 59 5797Yes 1 18----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 9----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 160 15899Yes 1 161 15898Yes 1 48 48100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles