Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Masconomet Regional High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Masconomet Regional High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Masconomet (07050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
60% - Substantial progress toward targets90

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%49%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
60%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage49%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage77%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage80%43%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
58%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage43% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage80%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
85

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 99.6 -0.1 100.0 2834Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.9 98.9 0.0 100.0 694Exceeded Target
High needs 98.3 98.4 0.1 100.0 644Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 97.9 98.3 0.4 100.0 454Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.7 99.7 0.0 100.0 2514Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 95.2 -3.3 100.0 2820Declined
Lowest Performing 93.7 80.8 -12.9 95.8 690Declined
High needs 92.8 80.6 -12.2 94.8 630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 91.0 75.6 -15.4 93.6 440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.6 94.9 -3.7 100.0 2500Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 96.7 -2.8 100.0 2783Met Target
Lowest Performing 98.1 87.7 -10.4 100.0 690Declined
High needs 97.7 87.3 -10.4 100.0 630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 97.1 84.8 -12.3 99.6 460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.6 96.8 -2.8 100.0 2483Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 53.5 2683Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 35.1 651Low Growth
High needs 49.3 592Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged- 21--
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 45.5 422Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.- 1--
White 53.2 2403Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 56.9 2663Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 37.4 651Low Growth
High needs 49.5 582Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged- 21--
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 44.2 412Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.- 1--
White 56.5 2383Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 98.6 -0.2 99.9 2904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.7 96.3 0.6 98.9 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 38--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 93.6 94.6 1.0 97.5 562Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.7 98.5 -0.2 100.0 2644Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.6 99.4 0.8 99.6 3294Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.4 97.1 0.7 99.0 703Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 96.6 95.7 -0.9 100.0 473Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 99.4 0.6 100.0 3134Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.2 -0.1 1.0 1,1434Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 2283Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 77--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1714Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 45--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 1,0413Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.3 9.6 1.3 7.2 1,1420Declined
Lowest Performing 10.4 17.4 7.0 6.4 690Declined
High needs 16.6 17.8 1.2 13.5 2360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 57--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 20.0 19.4 -0.6 16.1 1702Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 45--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 8.7 9.9 1.2 7.3 1,0340Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.5 69.8 -15.7 88.2 5490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.0 40.2 -9.8 56.6 1020Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 35--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 38.4 27.8 -10.6 45.6 720Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 86.0 69.3 -16.7 88.8 5050Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles