Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Old Rochester

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Old Rochester

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Old Rochester (07400000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Partially meeting targets

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-24-44-14-
Mathematics achievement24-24-14-04-
Science achievement14----14----
Achievement total41267.54867.561247.51867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-24-14-
Mathematics growth24-34-24-24-
Growth total4822.55822.54822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-14-44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total0410.01410.08810.00410.0
Weighted total3.610.3-3.97.6-6.610.7-1.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 35%-51%-62%-18%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan43%
Weight of non-high school results:40%
40%
Weight of high school results:60%
Criterion-referenced target percentage41%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-14-
Mathematics achievement44-04-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total91267.541247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---04-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion---44-
Additional indicators total0410.08810.0
Weighted total7.210.3-4.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 70%-43%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan70%
Weight of non-high school results:40%
43%
Weight of high school results:60%
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.4 505.9 -0.5 508.2 4801No Change
Lowest Performing 489.4 489.6 0.2 493.8 592Improved Below Target
High needs 493.7 493.5 -0.2 495.2 1211No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 74--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.2 506.3 -0.9 509.2 4390Declined

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 98.6 -0.7 100.0 1804Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.1 96.9 -0.2 99.1 401No Change
High needs 95.8 94.2 -1.6 97.7 431No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 98.9 -0.4 100.0 1664Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.3 505.8 0.5 507.0 4802Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 486.5 488.1 1.6 489.1 592Improved Below Target
High needs 491.7 495.2 3.5 493.2 1214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 74--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.3 506.2 -0.1 508.0 4391No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 96.2 -2.1 100.0 1791No Change
Lowest Performing 94.8 86.9 -7.9 97.6 400Declined
High needs 90.8 87.5 -3.3 93.3 420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.4 96.7 -1.7 100.0 1653Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.7 77.1 -0.6 79.5 2591No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.9 63.1 8.2 57.2 594Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 41--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.0 79.2 0.2 80.8 2362Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.1 94.8 -0.3 96.9 1631No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 82.0 83.8 1.8 84.3 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.7 95.7 0.0 97.5 1511No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.2 50.0 4632Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.5 50.0 592Below Target
High needs 44.8 50.0 1132Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 70--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.3 50.0 4242Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.1 50.0 1592Below Target
Lowest Performing 35.0 50.0 351Below Target
High needs 40.0 50.0 332Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 21--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.4 50.0 1492Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.7 50.0 4622Below Target
Lowest Performing 51.0 50.0 593Met Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 1123Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 70--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.1 50.0 4222Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.5 50.0 1602Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.4 50.0 362Below Target
High needs 51.4 50.0 333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 21--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.8 50.0 1492Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 95.0 0.2 96.8 1803Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.2 83.0 -3.2 90.3 470Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 40--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.0 95.7 0.7 97.1 1643Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 96.9 -0.9 99.4 1913Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.5 92.3 -3.2 99.0 650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 43--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 36--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 97.2 -1.6 100.0 1793Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 0.3 0.2 1.0 7444Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.7 0.8 1.9 2.4 1254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 57--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 79--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 0.3 0.1 1.0 6814Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.6 7.2 -0.6 5.5 4860Declined
Lowest Performing 6.8 6.8 0.0 4.7 591No Change
High needs 11.1 16.8 -5.7 9.2 1190Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 62--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 68--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 6.8 -0.3 5.5 4441No Change

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.5 9.6 1.9 10.4 7824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 9.3 10.0 -0.7 7.2 400Declined
High needs 25.3 22.2 3.1 23.4 1584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 80--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 83--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 10.6 8.3 2.3 9.6 7134Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.5 81.1 6.6 79.1 3914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 41.5 61.1 19.6 48.5 724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.2 81.4 6.2 80.3 3614Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 662 660100Yes 1 662 659100Yes 1 441 440100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 165 16499Yes 1 165 16399Yes 1 103 103100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 102 10199Yes 1 102 10098Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 5---- 5---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 91 91100Yes 1 91 9099Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 9---- 9---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 12---- 12---- 10----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 14----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 606 605100Yes 1 606 604100Yes 1 403 402100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Old Rochester Regional HighNot requiring assistance or intervention
Old Rochester Regional Jr HighNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles