Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Old Rochester Regional Jr High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Old Rochester Regional Jr High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Old Rochester (07400000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Old Rochester Regional Jr High (07400405)
GRADES SERVED
07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
40% - Partially meeting targets58

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-24-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total31267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.01410.0
Weighted total2.910.3-3.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 28%-51%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total7.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 77%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 54

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.6 506.0 -0.6 508.1 4740Declined
Lowest Performing 489.4 489.6 0.2 494.1 592Improved Below Target
High needs 493.8 493.9 0.1 495.4 1182Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.6 496.5 -1.1 499.0 710Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 484.9 484.6 -0.3 486.6 661No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.3 506.4 -0.9 508.9 4340Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.5 505.9 0.4 506.9 4742Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 486.5 488.1 1.6 490.1 592Improved Below Target
High needs 491.8 495.3 3.5 493.5 1184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.7 497.1 2.4 495.8 714Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 483.6 486.8 3.2 485.7 664Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.4 506.3 -0.1 507.9 4341No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.0 77.1 -0.9 80.4 2571No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.8 63.4 8.6 57.6 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.2 65.6 6.4 62.1 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 47.4 53.4 6.0 50.5 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.4 79.1 -0.3 81.8 2351No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.2 50.0 4632Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.5 50.0 592Below Target
High needs 44.8 50.0 1132Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.7 50.0 702Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 40.8 50.0 612Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.3 50.0 4242Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.7 50.0 4622Below Target
Lowest Performing 51.0 50.0 593Met Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 1123Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.8 50.0 703Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 50.2 50.0 603Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.1 50.0 4222Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.6 7.2 -0.6 5.5 4860Declined
Lowest Performing 6.8 6.8 0.0 3.2 591No Change
High needs 11.1 16.8 -5.7 8.7 1190Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.9 11.3 6.6 14.4 624Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 19.1 -12.8 3.0 680Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 6.8 -0.3 5.2 4441No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 481 480100Yes 1 481 480100Yes 1 260 259100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 121 121100Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 74 74100Yes 1 74 74100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 69 69100Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 17---- 17---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 440 439100Yes 1 440 439100Yes 1 237 236100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles