Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carver

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Carver

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Carver (00520000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Partially meeting targets

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-24-34-
Science achievement44----34----
Achievement total41267.56867.591247.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-24-14-
Mathematics growth24-34-34-34-
Growth total4822.55822.55822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------44----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------121220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------24----
Additional indicators total0410.00410.05810.04410.0
Weighted total3.610.3-5.27.6-8.310.7-6.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 35%-68%-78%-79%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan52%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
79%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage60%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement44-44-
Achievement total41267.5121247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-44-
Growth total4822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---44-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---121220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-
Advanced coursework completion---04-
Additional indicators total0410.02810.0
Weighted total3.610.3-9.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 35%-91%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan35%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
91%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.5 497.5 -1.0 500.3 7260Declined
Lowest Performing 480.3 481.7 1.4 484.7 1402Improved Below Target
High needs 490.3 489.5 -0.8 491.8 3110Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 200--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 170--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 498.6 497.7 -0.9 500.6 6850Declined

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 99.5 0.5 100.0 984Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.8 98.0 0.2 99.8 254Exceeded Target
High needs 96.3 98.4 2.1 98.2 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.5 0.6 100.0 964Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.5 495.0 -1.5 498.2 7280Declined
Lowest Performing 476.1 480.1 4.0 478.7 1414Exceeded Target
High needs 488.2 486.4 -1.8 489.7 3140Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 203--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 173--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 496.8 495.3 -1.5 498.5 6850Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.8 96.1 0.3 97.6 972Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 88.6 92.0 3.4 91.4 253Met Target
High needs 84.6 88.7 4.1 87.1 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.7 96.1 0.4 97.5 952Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.4 71.5 3.1 70.2 2264Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 52.9 61.6 8.7 55.2 954Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 60--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 52--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 68.7 72.7 4.0 70.5 2114Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.3 91.4 2.1 91.1 903Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 75.0 85.2 10.2 77.3 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.1 91.2 1.1 91.9 883Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.7 50.0 5822Below Target
Lowest Performing 47.6 50.0 1372Below Target
High needs 43.1 50.0 2402Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 154--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 125--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 44.8 50.0 5492Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.6 50.0 912Below Target
Lowest Performing 31.4 50.0 251Below Target
High needs 41.8 50.0 292Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.6 50.0 892Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.7 50.0 5842Below Target
Lowest Performing 52.3 50.0 1383Met Target
High needs 44.6 50.0 2412Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 156--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 126--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 45.6 50.0 5502Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.2 50.0 893Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.4 50.0 243Met Target
High needs 61.4 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.9 50.0 873Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 88.8 92.6 3.8 90.8 1084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 75.0 88.0 13.0 79.1 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 43--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 0--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.3 94.0 5.7 90.4 1004Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.5 96.3 3.8 94.1 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.0 90.9 7.9 86.5 444Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.2 96.1 3.9 94.0 1034Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.1 0.7 1.4 1.9 4164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 5.8 1.8 4.0 5.2 1134Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 70--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 71--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.3 0.5 1.8 2.1 3954Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.7 8.6 -2.9 4.6 1,0110Declined
Lowest Performing 8.1 10.6 -2.5 6.0 1410Declined
High needs 9.5 13.5 -4.0 7.6 4300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 236--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 224--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 5.6 7.8 -2.2 4.6 9540Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.2 11.4 0.8 11.1 4313Met Target
Lowest Performing 21.7 0.0 21.7 19.6 254Exceeded Target
High needs 17.1 16.9 0.2 15.2 1422Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 73--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 85--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 11.7 10.9 0.8 10.7 4143Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.8 70.8 1.0 74.4 1852Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.6 36.4 -9.2 52.6 440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.5 71.4 -0.1 76.6 1751No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 833 82499Yes 1 833 82599Yes 1 329 32498Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 348 34399Yes 1 348 34599Yes 1 128 12799Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 222 21999Yes 1 222 221100Yes 1 80 7999Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 193 18998Yes 1 194 19299Yes 1 72 7199Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 3---- 0----
Asian 4---- 4---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 18---- 18---- 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 787 78199Yes 1 786 78099Yes 1 311 30799Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Carver Elementary SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Carver Middle/High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles