Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Quaboag Regional

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Quaboag Regional

District Information

District:

Quaboag Regional (07780000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.9	84.2	85.5	1.3	91.2	92.5	25	771	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.1	75.3	77.3	2.0	86.6	88.6	42	375	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	79.4	1.7	79.6	88.9	32	302	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		70.0	-	-	-	-	85.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.3	60.7	61.3	0.6	80.3	83.2	22	119	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.8	71.2	75.5	4.3	86.5	88.4	22	47	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.5	85.2	86.3	1.1	91.5	92.8	20	701	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.7	80.7	80.4	-0.3	86.4	88.4	30	769	25	No Change
High needs		66.1	71.3	71.0	-0.3	80.2	83.1	58	373	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.8	73.8	73.2	-0.6	76.0	86.9	45	300	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		58.8	-	-	-	-	79.4	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.1	54.8	54.8	0.0	73.2	77.1	35	119	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.9	69.2	65.2	-4.0	76.0	79.5	21	46	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		77.7	81.6	81.8	0.2	87.0	88.9	28	700	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.4	82.6	79.5	-3.1	86.8	88.7	35	296	0	Declined
High needs		65.3	75.3	70.0	-5.3	79.8	82.7	56	136	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.0	79.0	70.2	-8.8	80.8	89.5	39	110	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	57.7	57.6	-0.1	70.8	75.0	36	46	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.4	82.5	81.5	-1.0	87.4	89.2	38	271	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.0	14.5	771	0	8.2	7.1	771	25
High needs	7.4	5.3	375	0	14.6	13.3	375	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.0	6.3	302	0	12.0	11.6	302	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.8	0.0	119	0	29.0	28.6	119	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	12.8	10.6	47	0	15.4	14.9	47	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	13.5	15.0	701	25	7.6	6.6	701	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.4	27.4	769	25	12.9	12.7	769	0
High needs	16.2	16.6	373	0	23.1	20.4	373	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.8	18.0	300	0	19.5	18.7	300	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	6.7	119	25	43.8	35.3	119	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	17.9	17.4	46	0	28.2	21.7	46	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.7	28.1	700	25	11.8	11.7	700	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.5	17.6	296	25	7.7	9.8	296	0
High needs	5.3	13.2	136	25	14.6	17.6	136	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.9	15.5	110	25	10.2	16.4	110	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.8	2.2	46	25	29.1	34.8	46	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.1	18.5	271	25	7.1	8.9	271	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	50.0	6.0	51.0	No	621	50	Below Target
High needs		41.0	45.0	4.0	51.0	No	294	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.5	45.0	3.5	51.0	No	234	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		31.0	44.5	13.5	51.0	No	94	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.0	53.5	10.5	51.0	Yes	32	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	50.0	6.0	51.0	No	569	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	44.0	-4.0	51.0	No	616	50	Below Target
High needs		45.0	39.0	-6.0	51.0	No	291	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.5	37.5	-8.0	51.0	No	232	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	44.0	7.0	51.0	No	93	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		46.0	47.0	1.0	51.0	No	31	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	44.0	-4.0	51.0	No	565	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	15.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	15.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	15.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.3	83.3	-6.0	80.0	90.0	90	75	On Target
High needs		82.6	71.4	-11.2	80.0	90.0	49	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		90.5	88.8	-1.7	80.0	90.0	80	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.7	90.5	7.8	85.0	95.0	84	75	On Target
High needs		77.8	82.6	4.8	85.0	95.0	46	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		83.7	91.9	8.2	85.0	95.0	74	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		4.4	0.5	1.3	-0.8	2.6	2.2	43	383	75	On Target
High needs		8.0	1.1	1.4	-0.3	4.7	4.0	67	145	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	111	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		14.6	2.3	3.6	-1.3	8.5	7.3	38	55	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		3.9	0.6	1.5	-0.9	2.3	2.0	33	337	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	775	773	100	Yes	775	771	99	Yes	303	302	100	Yes
High needs	378	377	100	Yes	378	375	99	Yes	140	139	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	303	302	100	Yes	303	300	99	Yes	113	112	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	28	28	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	119	119	100	Yes	119	119	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	49	49	100	Yes	49	48	98	Yes	18	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	703	701	100	Yes	703	700	100	Yes	275	274	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.