Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ralph C Mahar

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Ralph C Mahar

District Information

District:

Ralph C Mahar (07550000)

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.2	83.1	82.8	-0.3	93.1	94.1	16	345	25	No Change
High needs		81.9	72.8	73.1	0.3	89.4	91.0	17	180	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.8	74.8	75.0	0.2	76.9	87.4	13	147	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.6	57.0	55.9	-1.1	77.6	80.8	7	72	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		82.6	-	-	-	-	91.3	-	30	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.4	83.6	84.1	0.5	93.2	94.2	11	279	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.3	73.9	74.3	0.4	83.8	86.2	12	345	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		62.0	57.9	62.8	4.9	77.8	81.0	11	181	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.2	60.2	64.8	4.6	63.5	80.1	11	149	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.7	39.9	40.9	1.0	66.0	70.9	2	74	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.1	-	-	-	-	82.1	-	30	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.1	74.5	75.3	0.8	84.3	86.6	8	279	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.3	79.8	72.0	-7.8	90.3	91.7	14	220	0	Declined
High needs		76.2	68.7	61.3	-7.4	86.1	88.1	14	108	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.8	72.8	62.4	-10.4	75.1	86.4	13	91	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.4	52.9	45.8	-7.1	76.3	79.7	5	42	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.8	80.8	73.0	-7.8	90.6	91.9	9	187	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.3	16.8	345	0	10.5	9.9	345	0
High needs	4.1	10.6	180	25	17.5	18.3	180	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.1	10.9	147	25	16.8	15.6	147	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	4.2	72	25	35.3	36.1	72	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.4	17.2	279	0	10.4	9.3	279	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.6	27.0	345	25	20.3	19.4	345	0
High needs	8.2	13.8	181	25	36.3	30.4	181	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.0	14.1	149	25	32.8	28.9	149	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.5	5.4	74	25	62.7	58.1	74	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.5	29.7	279	25	21.1	19.4	279	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.1	10.5	220	25	9.0	20.0	220	0
High needs	1.0	3.7	108	25	18.4	32.4	108	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	4.4	91	25	14.1	28.6	91	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	42	0	37.2	59.5	42	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.6	9.6	187	25	8.6	19.8	187	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.0	33.0	-1.0	51.0	No	306	25	Below Target
High needs		25.0	29.5	4.5	51.0	No	148	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		25.0	28.5	3.5	51.0	No	124	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		23.5	28.0	4.5	51.0	No	57	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		36.0	33.0	-3.0	51.0	No	250	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	45.0	-2.0	51.0	No	303	50	Below Target
High needs		42.0	39.0	-3.0	51.0	No	146	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	39.0	-6.0	51.0	No	123	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		23.5	38.0	14.5	51.0	No	55	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		46.0	47.0	1.0	51.0	No	247	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.1	72.8	1.7	80.0	90.0	162	25	No Change
High needs		69.7	71.8	2.1	80.0	90.0	85	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.3	59.3	3.0	80.0	90.0	27	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		69.3	74.8	5.5	80.0	90.0	147	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.0	75.4	-1.6	85.0	95.0	187	25	No Change
High needs		71.2	70.8	-0.4	85.0	95.0	89	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.6	59.4	-11.2	85.0	95.0	32	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		78.4	74.2	-4.2	85.0	95.0	163	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		8.7	3.7	5.5	-1.8	5.1	4.4	5	548	0	Declined
High needs		8.9	4.5	9.1	-4.6	5.2	4.5	3	186	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		8.3	-	-	-	-	4.2	-	145	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		15.9	5.6	13.8	-8.2	9.3	8.0	2	65	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		20.8	7.7	0.0	7.7	15.6	10.4	83	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		8.6	3.9	5.6	-1.7	5.0	4.3	4	478	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	359	346	96	Yes	359	346	96	Yes	235	234	100	Yes
High needs	191	181	95	Yes	191	182	95	Yes	122	121	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	157	148	94	No	157	150	96	Yes	103	103	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	76	72	95	Yes	78	74	95	Yes	48	47	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	32	30	94	No	32	30	94	No	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	290	279	96	Yes	290	279	96	Yes	199	198	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.