Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norton

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Norton

District Information

District:

Norton (02180000)

Region:

Southeast

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.5	91.0	91.6	0.6	95.0	95.8	64	1377	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		82.3	79.7	81.4	1.7	89.7	91.2	70	405	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.5	85.5	85.3	-0.2	86.7	92.8	72	215	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		75.8	72.6	74.7	2.1	85.9	87.9	70	254	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		91.3	-	-	-	-	95.7	-	26	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.7	75.0	85.3	10.3	87.1	90.4	66	39	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		90.2	90.4	84.1	-6.3	94.3	95.1	28	41	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		91.7	91.4	92.2	0.8	95.2	95.9	64	1246	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.6	85.0	84.5	-0.5	91.6	92.8	55	1379	25	No Change
High needs		73.2	69.7	68.1	-1.6	84.4	86.6	37	405	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.4	75.4	72.4	-3.0	77.5	87.7	38	215	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		68.3	61.7	59.6	-2.1	81.5	84.2	60	254	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		88.0	-	-	-	-	94.0	-	26	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.6	63.3	66.3	3.0	81.1	85.8	24	40	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		83.7	87.5	81.7	-5.8	90.5	91.9	48	41	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		86.0	85.7	85.4	-0.3	91.8	93.0	51	1247	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.1	86.2	84.2	-2.0	91.9	93.1	59	587	25	No Change
High needs		74.6	73.6	71.0	-2.6	85.2	87.3	60	157	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.3	79.3	75.3	-4.0	81.0	89.7	70	77	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.4	66.7	65.2	-1.5	82.2	84.7	66	102	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		86.4	86.7	85.2	-1.5	92.1	93.2	60	546	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	23.9	22.4	1377	0	3.8	3.0	1377	25
High needs	8.7	5.7	405	0	11.4	9.4	405	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.2	7.4	215	0	6.6	7.0	215	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.8	2.8	254	25	17.3	13.4	254	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.7	5.1	39	0	10.0	7.7	39	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	29.4	17.1	41	0	5.9	4.9	41	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	24.4	23.1	1246	0	3.6	2.6	1246	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	28.9	30.2	1379	0	8.3	8.4	1379	0
High needs	11.2	11.6	405	0	21.6	23.0	405	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.7	15.3	215	25	14.1	18.6	215	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.3	5.5	254	0	30.4	33.1	254	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.3	12.5	40	25	33.3	22.5	40	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	32.4	14.6	41	0	5.9	12.2	41	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	29.7	31.6	1247	0	7.5	7.6	1247	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.7	21.1	587	25	5.0	5.3	587	0
High needs	6.7	5.7	157	0	13.3	15.3	157	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.2	6.5	77	0	8.2	10.4	77	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.6	4.9	102	25	18.9	23.5	102	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	18.0	22.0	546	25	5.0	4.6	546	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	53.0	3.0	51.0	No	1130	75	On Target
High needs		48.0	48.5	0.5	51.0	No	304	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.0	46.5	-10.5	51.0	No	162	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	50.0	4.0	51.0	No	186	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		49.5	53.0	3.5	51.0	No	1033	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.0	54.5	2.5	51.0	No	1132	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	57.0	6.0	51.0	No	306	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		53.5	59.0	5.5	51.0	No	163	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.5	52.0	4.5	51.0	No	188	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	30	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		52.0	55.0	3.0	51.0	No	1034	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	14.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	14.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	14.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.5	91.0	3.5	80.0	90.0	166	75	On Target
High needs		77.1	81.6	4.5	80.0	90.0	49	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		68.8	70.8	2.0	80.0	90.0	24	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		87.9	90.6	2.7	80.0	90.0	149	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.1	88.0	1.9	85.0	95.0	192	75	On Target
High needs		75.8	77.1	1.3	85.0	95.0	83	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		65.8	68.8	3.0	85.0	95.0	48	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
White		85.9	88.5	2.6	85.0	95.0	182	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		3.6	2.2	1.2	1.0	2.1	1.8	45	731	75	On Target
High needs		5.8	3.1	1.8	1.3	3.4	2.9	58	166	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.6	-	-	-	-	1.3	-	76	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		7.8	4.3	1.8	2.5	4.6	3.9	59	113	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		3.3	2.3	1.3	1.0	1.9	1.7	39	692	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	1384	1378	100	Yes	1385	1380	100	Yes	603	600	100	Yes
High needs	409	406	99	Yes	410	406	99	Yes	161	160	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	217	216	100	Yes	217	216	100	Yes	81	80	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	256	254	99	Yes	257	254	99	Yes	102	102	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	26	26	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	39	39	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	1253	1247	100	Yes	1253	1248	100	Yes	559	556	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.