Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hull

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Hull

District Information

District:

Hull (01420000)

Region:

Southeast

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.7	86.9	91.7	4.8	94.0	94.9	65	479	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		83.1	77.1	83.2	6.1	90.1	91.6	79	189	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.2	78.2	84.9	6.7	80.0	89.1	68	142	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.2	61.5	71.9	10.4	85.0	87.1	61	89	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		90.0	87.3	91.8	4.5	94.2	95.0	61	461	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.8	79.8	84.8	5.0	88.8	90.4	57	482	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		71.8	67.0	74.2	7.2	83.6	85.9	77	190	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.3	68.3	77.3	9.0	70.9	84.2	73	142	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.4	51.4	61.0	9.6	77.5	80.7	63	89	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		81.0	80.4	85.6	5.2	88.9	90.5	53	464	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.5	81.7	81.2	-0.5	88.6	90.3	45	205	25	No Change
High needs		75.0	71.9	67.5	-4.4	85.4	87.5	38	77	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.5	72.5	69.2	-3.3	74.8	86.3	31	60	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.1	56.9	64.1	7.2	82.6	85.1	63	39	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.6	82.2	81.4	-0.8	88.7	90.3	37	198	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.0	25.3	479	25	5.9	3.5	479	25
High needs	8.3	10.6	189	25	14.1	7.9	189	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.0	14.1	142	25	12.9	8.5	142	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	89	0	30.6	14.6	89	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	18.8	25.4	461	25	5.6	3.5	461	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.3	36.9	482	25	12.1	9.8	482	25
High needs	9.9	19.5	190	25	23.6	18.9	190	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.3	21.1	142	25	21.4	16.2	142	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.4	9.0	89	25	43.1	31.5	89	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	25.1	37.5	464	25	11.2	8.8	464	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.4	18.0	205	0	7.9	7.3	205	0
High needs	13.5	13.0	77	0	15.6	14.3	77	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.5	10.0	60	0	17.7	11.7	60	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	12.8	39	25	33.3	23.1	39	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.6	18.2	198	0	7.4	7.1	198	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	64.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	385	100	Above Target
High needs		39.5	57.0	17.5	51.0	Yes	143	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		37.5	57.0	19.5	51.0	Yes	113	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	52.5	16.5	51.0	No	64	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	63.5	19.5	51.0	Yes	372	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.5	50.0	12.5	51.0	Yes	385	75	On Target
High needs		32.0	51.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	145	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.5	51.0	20.5	51.0	Yes	113	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.5	51.5	23.0	51.0	No	66	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		37.5	50.0	12.5	51.0	Yes	373	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.9	90.3	8.4	80.0	90.0	93	75	On Target
High needs		69.2	84.6	15.4	80.0	90.0	52	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
White		82.3	89.5	7.2	80.0	90.0	86	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.7	84.3	-11.4	85.0	95.0	83	0	Declined
High needs		91.8	74.4	-17.4	85.0	95.0	39	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		96.7	84.8	-11.9	85.0	95.0	79	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		2.2	0.9	2.0	-1.1	1.3	1.1	27	342	0	Declined
High needs		3.0	1.3	3.2	-1.9	1.8	1.5	36	125	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.2	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	91	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		1.9	5.0	3.9	1.1	1.1	1.0	34	51	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		2.0	0.9	2.2	-1.3	1.2	1.0	20	314	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	488	479	98	Yes	490	482	98	Yes	211	209	99	Yes
High needs	195	189	97	Yes	197	190	96	Yes	79	79	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	145	142	98	Yes	146	142	97	Yes	60	60	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	95	89	94	No	96	89	93	No	40	40	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	470	461	98	Yes	472	464	98	Yes	202	200	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.