Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Excel High School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Excel High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of broad/comprehensive support
Underperforming school

Low participation rate: Afr. Amer./Black -Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -All students
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
46% - Moderate progress toward targets6.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage36%52%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
46%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage36%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage26%57%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
45%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage26%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
8

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 83.6 88.2 4.6 85.4 934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 19--
High needs 81.2 86.6 5.4 83.7 824Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 81.0 86.2 5.2 83.1 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 77.2 83.1 5.9 80.7 404Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 58.0 65.9 7.9 61.1 224Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 84.6 89.0 4.4 87.5 344Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 78.8 84.1 5.3 81.0 334Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 5--

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.7 78.5 0.8 80.3 922Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing---- 19--
High needs 74.4 76.5 2.1 76.8 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 73.4 74.6 1.2 75.9 672Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 77.1 81.9 4.8 82.6 403Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 54.8 55.0 0.2 58.7 202Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 21--
Afr. Amer./Black 72.0 74.2 2.2 76.3 322Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 72.7 73.5 0.8 75.7 332Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 5--

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.4 65.0 -5.4 72.9 600Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 67.3 64.9 -2.4 69.8 571No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 67.9 64.7 -3.2 70.6 460Declined
EL and Former EL 65.5 72.7 7.2 69.4 324Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black 70.2 50.0 -20.2 73.2 200Declined
Hispanic/Latino 63.4 60.7 -2.7 67.0 210Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 2--

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 39.7 611Low Growth
Lowest Performing- 13--
High needs 37.9 551Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.4 481Low Growth
EL and Former EL 45.8 232Typical Growth - Low
Students w/ disabilities- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black 31.0 251Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 43.9 252Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White- 2--

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 39.1 601Low Growth
Lowest Performing- 13--
High needs 39.9 541Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.9 471Low Growth
EL and Former EL 52.2 243Typical Growth - High
Students w/ disabilities- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 30.3 241Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 44.6 242Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White- 2--

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 70.3 82.9 12.6 73.3 1464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.5 83.2 14.7 72.3 1314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 67.5 83.5 16.0 71.8 1154Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 66.1 84.4 18.3 73.5 644Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 40.7 75.7 35.0 48.8 374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 39--
Afr. Amer./Black 80.5 85.2 4.7 86.8 612Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 52.9 64.7 11.8 57.9 344Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 9--

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 77.7 78.3 0.6 80.9 1382Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 79.4 76.9 -2.5 83.9 1300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 80.0 75.0 -5.0 84.6 1200Declined
EL and Former EL 80.3 82.1 1.8 86.0 562Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 69.8 51.9 -17.9 76.0 270Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 36--
Afr. Amer./Black 75.4 85.4 10.0 80.1 414Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 72.1 58.8 -13.3 77.9 340Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 25--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.9 2.6 -0.3 2.6 4913Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.9 2.4 -0.5 2.6 4173Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 1.8 -1.2 2.7 3284Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 3.8 1.2 -2.6 3.4 1654Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 5.6 -0.7 5.7 1243Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 113--
Afr. Amer./Black 3.0 1.6 -1.4 2.7 1834Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 6.0 4.7 -1.3 5.4 1504Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 36--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 31.1 35.4 4.3 36.6 1273Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 31.1 35.4 4.3 36.6 1273Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.6 44.7 -2.9 44.6 5213Met Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 50.7 45.2 -5.5 47.1 4514Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.8 48.6 -2.2 46.8 3212Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 40.0 33.8 -6.2 35.6 2044Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 61.3 60.7 -0.6 57.5 1222Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 105--
Afr. Amer./Black 46.7 48.7 2.0 43.0 1870Declined
Hispanic/Latino 61.3 53.0 -8.3 57.4 1684Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 51--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.3 19.9 -33.4 59.0 2510Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 52.7 17.7 -35.0 58.3 2090Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.6 17.8 -35.8 59.3 1630Declined
EL and Former EL 55.7 18.0 -37.7 61.3 1000Declined
Students w/ disabilities 44.2 4.3 -39.9 50.1 460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 52--
Afr. Amer./Black 58.3 18.7 -39.6 64.8 910Declined
Hispanic/Latino 47.7 16.9 -30.8 55.2 770Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 28--


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles