Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Excel High School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Excel High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of broad/comprehensive support
Underperforming school

Low subgroup performance: Economically disadvantaged

Low participation rate: Afr. Amer./Black -Students w/disabilities
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
36% - Partially meeting targets4.00
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage36%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Weighted total---
Percentage of possible points --
Criterion-referenced target percentage26%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 7

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.1 83.6 -6.5 91.8 900Declined
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 88.4 81.2 -7.2 90.6 770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.7 81.0 -9.7 92.5 620Declined
EL and Former EL 85.4 77.2 -8.2 88.4 340Declined
Students w/ disabilities 79.6 58.0 -21.6 82.6 220Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black 94.3 84.6 -9.7 96.9 340Declined
Hispanic/Latino 88.9 78.8 -10.1 90.9 330Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 9--

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.1 77.7 -4.4 84.3 910Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 80.9 74.4 -6.5 83.3 780Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 83.5 73.4 -10.1 86.0 610Declined
EL and Former EL 82.2 77.1 -5.1 87.3 360Declined
Students w/ disabilities 64.8 54.8 -10.0 68.6 210Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black 79.9 72.0 -7.9 84.8 330Declined
Hispanic/Latino 86.4 72.7 -13.7 89.6 330Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 9--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.7 70.4 -2.3 75.2 701No Change
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 71.2 67.3 -3.9 73.5 620Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 74.0 67.9 -6.1 76.9 490Declined
EL and Former EL 66.4 65.5 -0.9 69.7 291No Change
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 71.4 70.2 -1.2 74.6 261No Change
Hispanic/Latino 76.7 63.4 -13.3 80.7 280Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 6--

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 35.4 50.0 781Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 32.1 50.0 681Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.6 50.0 561Below Target
EL and Former EL 28.9 50.0 290Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 18.5 50.0 210Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 34.3 50.0 291Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 34.9 50.0 321Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 7--

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.8 50.0 752Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs 39.6 50.0 651Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.0 50.0 532Below Target
EL and Former EL 40.4 50.0 292Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 41.5 50.0 282Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 43.0 50.0 312Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 6--

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 66.3 70.3 4.0 70.1 1383Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 67.1 68.5 1.4 71.2 1302Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 69.0 67.5 -1.5 73.9 1200Declined
EL and Former EL 68.9 66.1 -2.8 74.9 560Declined
Students w/ disabilities 58.1 40.7 -17.4 67.0 270Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 36--
Afr. Amer./Black 63.1 80.5 17.4 69.4 414Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 67.4 52.9 -14.5 72.5 340Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 25--

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 73.2 77.7 4.5 76.3 1664Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 74.1 79.4 5.3 78.8 1554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 73.4 80.0 6.6 78.3 1454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 80.6 80.3 -0.3 86.0 611No Change
Students w/ disabilities 62.2 69.8 7.6 69.0 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 36--
Afr. Amer./Black 73.2 75.4 2.2 78.0 652Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 65.7 72.1 6.4 71.2 434Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 17--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 8.0 2.9 5.1 7.2 5244Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 6.5 2.9 3.6 5.9 4424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 3.0 5.2 7.4 3384Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 2.3 3.8 -1.5 2.1 1560Declined
Students w/ disabilities 1.4 6.3 -4.9 1.3 1430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 115--
Afr. Amer./Black 8.6 3.0 5.6 7.7 1984Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 7.2 6.0 1.2 6.5 1513Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White---- 51--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 32.1 31.1 -1.0 38.8 1322Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 32.1 31.1 -1.0 38.8 1322Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.1 47.6 -3.5 41.7 5270Declined
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 45.3 47.9 -2.6 42.1 4590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.3 50.8 -3.5 44.0 3270Declined
EL and Former EL 33.5 40.0 -6.5 28.5 2300Declined
Students w/ disabilities 54.1 61.3 -7.2 50.6 1190Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 128--
Afr. Amer./Black 48.7 46.7 2.0 44.3 1992Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 54.9 61.3 -6.4 51.0 1500Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 0--
White---- 39--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.2 55.3 0.1 61.3 2662Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 47.4 54.3 6.9 53.7 2193Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.7 52.7 7.0 52.2 1653Met Target
EL and Former EL 48.8 58.4 9.6 53.0 1254Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 17.7 41.1 23.4 23.7 564Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 74--
Afr. Amer./Black 51.0 59.8 8.8 60.2 1023Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 45.8 46.3 0.5 53.3 672Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 20--


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles