Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hull

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Hull

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hull (01420000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
46% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs intervention (NI)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-34-44-
Science achievement34----34----
Achievement total31267.52867.5101247.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-04-04-
Mathematics growth24-14-34-24-
Growth total4822.53822.53822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------04----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------81220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total4410.00410.00810.00410.0
Weighted total3.310.3-2.07.6-7.010.7-5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 32%-26%-65%-78%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan29%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
72%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total51267.5111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth14-34-
Growth total3822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion---04-
Additional indicators total3410.00810.0
Weighted total4.410.3-7.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 43%-72%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan43%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
72%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage55%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.3 502.6 -1.7 506.1 3820Declined
Lowest Performing 482.2 483.8 1.6 486.6 702Improved Below Target
High needs 492.6 492.4 -0.2 494.1 1631No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.5 494.2 -0.3 496.1 1261No Change
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 81--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 505.0 502.7 -2.3 507.0 3670Declined

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 99.3 1.2 99.6 734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.0 97.5 3.5 96.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 95.7 98.1 2.4 97.6 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.0 97.7 -1.3 100.0 224Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 99.3 1.0 99.8 684Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.5 499.8 -1.7 503.2 3830Declined
Lowest Performing 482.2 478.2 -4.0 484.8 700Declined
High needs 490.9 488.2 -2.7 492.4 1640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.9 489.9 -2.0 493.0 1270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 82--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 502.1 499.8 -2.3 503.8 3680Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.1 92.6 2.5 91.9 743Met Target
Lowest Performing 69.0 85.7 16.7 71.8 214Exceeded Target
High needs 81.6 85.7 4.1 84.1 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.4 89.8 4.4 88.1 224Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.3 93.1 1.8 93.1 693Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.4 77.7 1.3 78.2 1193Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 62.9 68.2 5.3 65.2 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 64.7 69.1 4.4 66.8 384Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.4 77.4 0.0 79.2 1131No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.2 94.0 1.8 94.0 673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.4 86.5 1.1 87.7 263Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.0 92.5 4.5 90.1 204Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.5 93.8 0.3 95.3 642Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.0 50.0 2972Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.7 50.0 702Below Target
High needs 42.2 50.0 1212Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.5 50.0 962Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 54--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.0 50.0 2872Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 28.9 50.0 650Below Target
Lowest Performing 23.7 50.0 200Below Target
High needs 38.0 50.0 231Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.4 50.0 202Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 29.3 50.0 620Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.4 50.0 2962Below Target
Lowest Performing 37.9 50.0 691Below Target
High needs 38.5 50.0 1201Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.6 50.0 951Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 53--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.1 50.0 2862Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.9 50.0 673Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.6 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 57.6 50.0 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.7 50.0 213Met Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.7 50.0 643Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 80.0 93.2 13.2 82.0 884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 73.1 86.0 12.9 77.2 434Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 71.7 87.2 15.5 76.2 394Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 81.3 93.6 12.3 83.4 784Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.6 91.1 -3.5 96.2 900Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.3 86.5 -5.8 95.8 520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.3 86.9 -4.4 95.2 460Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.2 91.3 -2.9 96.0 800Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.5 1.0 0.5 1.4 3114Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 4.1 2.6 1.5 3.7 1164Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.5 2.4 3.1 5.0 854Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 1.4 1.0 0.4 1.3 2864Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.4 7.8 2.6 9.3 5144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 9.9 14.3 -4.4 7.8 700Declined
High needs 17.2 15.5 1.7 15.3 2333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.4 19.2 -1.8 14.8 1560Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 111--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 10.3 7.5 2.8 9.3 4824Exceeded Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 23.3 28.5 -5.2 22.2 3120Declined
Lowest Performing 23.8 28.6 -4.8 21.7 210Declined
High needs 31.3 45.5 -14.2 29.4 1340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.0 51.8 -15.8 33.4 850Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 75--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 23.1 27.6 -4.5 22.1 2900Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.3 71.2 -7.1 82.9 1460Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.6 48.3 -3.3 58.6 580Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 64.1 41.0 -23.1 73.2 390Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 36--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.3 72.1 -9.2 86.4 1360Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 467 45597Yes 1 468 45798Yes 1 196 19499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 202 19095Yes 2 203 19295Yes 1 79 7797Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 155 14895Yes 1 156 14996Yes 1 61 6098Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 97 9094No 2 98 9294No 1 33 3196Yes 2
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 2---- 2---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 446 43598Yes 1 447 43798Yes 1 185 18399Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Hull HighNot requiring assistance or intervention
Lillian M JacobsNot requiring assistance or intervention
Memorial MiddleNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles