Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Munger Hill

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Munger Hill

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Westfield (03250000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Munger Hill (03250033)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
44% - Partially meeting targets44

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-24-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total41267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.04410.0
Weighted total3.810.3-3.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 37%-50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 61%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 16

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.4 499.3 -1.1 501.9 2000Declined
Lowest Performing 474.4 477.4 3.0 479.1 292Improved Below Target
High needs 484.1 487.4 3.3 485.7 784Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 486.1 489.3 3.2 487.5 564Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 478.2 480.0 1.8 479.9 473Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 494.9 489.1 -5.8 496.0 240Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.0 501.7 -0.3 503.6 1601No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.9 497.2 -3.7 502.3 2000Declined
Lowest Performing 472.9 473.6 0.7 476.5 292Improved Below Target
High needs 485.1 482.3 -2.8 486.8 780Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.7 485.5 -2.2 488.8 560Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 478.8 471.1 -7.7 480.9 470Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 490.9 484.0 -6.9 492.5 240Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.3 499.8 -2.5 503.8 1600Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.4 80.7 4.3 78.8 754Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.9 65.5 14.6 53.7 294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 49.0 57.5 8.5 52.1 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 78.1 84.0 5.9 80.5 614Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.3 50.0 1372Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.5 50.0 291Below Target
High needs 41.0 50.0 512Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.2 50.0 352Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 36.6 50.0 311Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.2 50.0 1082Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.6 50.0 1373Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.4 50.0 292Below Target
High needs 41.6 50.0 512Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.0 50.0 352Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 34.4 50.0 311Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.7 50.0 1083Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.3 6.4 -1.1 4.2 3420Declined
Lowest Performing 12.5 6.9 5.6 8.9 294Exceeded Target
High needs 10.7 15.0 -4.3 8.3 1200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.2 18.2 -5.0 9.7 770Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 10.4 19.1 -8.7 7.1 680Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 13.3 26.3 -13.0 9.7 380Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.5 2.9 0.6 2.2 2774Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 207 207100Yes 1 207 207100Yes 1 76 76100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 85 85100Yes 1 85 85100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 62 62100Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 49 49100Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 4---- 4---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 10---- 10---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 163 163100Yes 1 163 163100Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles