Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frank H Freedman
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Frank H Freedman
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Frank H Freedman (02810075)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.7, Target = 91.7CPI = 78.7, Target = 91.7CPI = 78.7, Target = 91.7 85.8 69.7 78.7 9.0 91.7 92.9 2512150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 75.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 75.8, Target = 91.5 85.5 64.3 75.8 11.5 91.5 92.8 509150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.8, Target = 67.8CPI = 76.8, Target = 67.8CPI = 76.8, Target = 67.8 64.9 64.9 76.8 11.9 67.8 82.5 5085100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 82.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.6, Target = 90.6 83.9 65.7 82.6 16.9 90.6 92.0 853650Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 90.8 84.3 68.1 76.1 8.0 90.8 92.2 656850Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------16--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.4, Target = 89.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 89.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 89.5 82.0 74.6 82.4 7.8 89.5 91.0 3611950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 80.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 80.1, Target = 88.9 81.0 69.8 80.1 10.3 88.9 90.5 688950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.1, Target = 72.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 72.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 72.3 69.8 69.8 80.1 10.3 72.3 84.9 6784100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 85.7, Target = 83.6CPI = 85.7, Target = 83.6CPI = 85.7, Target = 83.6 71.8 71.3 85.7 14.4 83.6 85.9 9235100Above Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 79.9, Target = 91.4CPI = 79.9, Target = 91.4CPI = 79.9, Target = 91.4 85.3 71.7 79.9 8.2 91.4 92.7 736750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------16--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.3, Target = 77.8CPI = 74.3, Target = 77.8CPI = 74.3, Target = 77.8 62.0 79.9 74.3 -5.6 77.8 81.0 32350Declined
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 76.5CPI = 73.3, Target = 76.5CPI = 73.3, Target = 76.5 59.7 76.0 73.3 -2.7 76.5 79.9 70290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  76.1---- 88.1-29--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino  55.4---- 77.7-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.6 9.112125 15.4 11.612125
High needs 3.7 5.59125 19.5 13.29125
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.9 5.98525 18.2 14.18525
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black 0.0 13.93625 18.5 8.33625
Hispanic/Latino 1.4 5.96825 15.9 14.7680
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--16---16-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.9 21.011925 13.8 5.911925
High needs 9.9 15.78925 17.3 7.98925
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.4 15.58425 16.9 7.18425
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black 7.4 25.73525 11.1 5.73525
Hispanic/Latino 13.0 16.46725 18.8 6.06725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--16---16-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 8.6350 11.1 8.63525
High needs 4.0 3.4290 16.0 10.32925
Econ. Disadvantaged--29---29-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 23.0 65.0 42.0 51.0Yes71100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 22.0 58.0 36.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 23.0 60.5 37.5 51.0Yes48100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-21--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 23.0 68.0 45.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 38.0 60.0 22.0 51.0Yes72100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 32.0 60.5 28.5 51.0Yes52100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 33.0 61.5 28.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-21--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 32.5 64.0 31.5 51.0Yes42100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13513399Yes13513197Yes3737100Yes
High needs10510398Yes10510196Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged989698Yes989597Yes3131100Yes
EL and Former EL18---18---4---
Students w/ disabilities21---21---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black3737100Yes373697Yes12---
Hispanic/Latino7676100Yes767599Yes2222100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21---21---3---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles