Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sandwich Middle High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Sandwich High

Organization Information
District:Sandwich (02610000)School type:High School
School:Sandwich High (02610505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.4, Target = 98.9CPI = 98.4, Target = 98.9 98.1 99.5 98.4 -1.1 98.9 99.1 56167100Above Target
High needsCPI = 93.4, Target = 96.7CPI = 93.4, Target = 96.7CPI = 93.4, Target = 96.7 94.4 97.7 93.4 -4.3 96.7 97.2 40340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.3, Target = 98.8CPI = 98.3, Target = 98.8 98.0 99.4 98.3 -1.1 98.8 99.0 38161100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 97.7CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.7CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.7 96.0 94.0 95.2 1.2 97.7 98.0 6716850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 86.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.8, Target = 93.1 88.2 77.4 86.8 9.4 93.1 94.1 693450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 95.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 95.7, Target = 97.7 96.0 94.0 95.7 1.7 97.7 98.0 6316250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.1, Target = 97.7CPI = 96.1, Target = 97.7CPI = 96.1, Target = 97.7 96.1 92.7 96.1 3.4 97.7 98.1 7616050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 87.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 93.6 89.1 83.3 87.9 4.6 93.6 94.6 713350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.5, Target = 97.7CPI = 96.5, Target = 97.7CPI = 96.5, Target = 97.7 96.0 93.1 96.5 3.4 97.7 98.0 7215575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 52.9 53.31670 0.0 0.016725
High needs 16.3 14.7340 0.0 0.03425
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 53.7 53.41610 0.0 0.016125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 57.0 57.11680 3.2 1.216825
High needs 19.0 20.6340 14.3 2.93425
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 57.4 57.41620 3.4 1.216225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.1 35.616025 0.0 0.016025
High needs 2.4 9.13325 0.0 0.03325
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.8 34.815525 0.0 0.015525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 42.0 39.0 -3.0 51.0No15925Below Target
High needsSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 39.0 29.0 -10.0 51.0No310Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 42.0 39.0 -3.0 51.0No15425Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 36.0 28.0 -8.0 51.0No1610Below Target
High needsSGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51 36.5 18.5 -18.0 51.0Yes3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51 36.0 27.5 -8.5 51.0No1560Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 93.3 95.7 2.4 80.0 90.0210100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80 88.9 91.2 2.3 80.0 90.06875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.047--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.6, Target = 80 93.4 96.6 3.2 80.0 90.0205100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85 91.5 95.7 4.2 85.0 95.0208100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85 79.8 96.8 17.0 85.0 95.063100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.047--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.07--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85 91.7 95.5 3.8 85.0 95.0198100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.8 0.77174175On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 1.8, Target = 1.6 2.7 1.6 1.8 -0.2 1.6 1.45316725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------65--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------117--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.8 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.76771875On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students17217199Yes172172100Yes172172100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---19---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities24---24---24---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---4---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino1---1---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16616599Yes166166100Yes166166100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles