Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cornelius M Callahan
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cornelius M Callahan
Organization Information
District:Norwood (02200000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cornelius M Callahan (02200010)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 94.9CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.9CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.9 91.3 93.3 88.5 -4.8 94.9 95.7 641370Declined
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 92CPI = 83.2, Target = 92CPI = 83.2, Target = 92 86.3 86.8 83.2 -3.6 92.0 93.2 82760Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.8, Target = 88.1CPI = 81.8, Target = 88.1CPI = 81.8, Target = 88.1 87.0 87.0 81.8 -5.2 88.1 93.5 74440Declined
EL and Former EL  87.5---- 93.8-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.6, Target = 87.2CPI = 75.6, Target = 87.2CPI = 75.6, Target = 87.2 78.0 74.0 75.6 1.6 87.2 89.0 793950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.3, Target = 95.9 92.9 94.2 90.3 -3.9 95.9 96.5 63930Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 94.9CPI = 90, Target = 94.9CPI = 90, Target = 94.9 91.3 93.0 90.0 -3.0 94.9 95.7 701370Declined
High needsCPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4 83.5 87.5 84.2 -3.3 90.4 91.8 84760Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.7, Target = 89CPI = 84.7, Target = 89CPI = 84.7, Target = 89 88.0 88.0 84.7 -3.3 89.0 94.0 83440Declined
EL and Former EL  92.7---- 96.4-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 86CPI = 72.4, Target = 86CPI = 72.4, Target = 86 76.0 76.0 72.4 -3.6 86.0 88.0 71390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.6, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.6, Target = 96.3 93.7 93.4 90.6 -2.8 96.3 96.9 66930Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 92.7CPI = 92.7, Target = 92.7 87.5 93.0 92.7 -0.3 92.7 93.8 9248100Above Target
High needs  88.8---- 94.4-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.5, Target = 94.8CPI = 95.5, Target = 94.8 91.1 94.1 95.5 1.4 94.8 95.6 9533100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.5 19.01370 1.4 2.21370
High needs 8.8 9.2760 2.9 2.67625
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.0 11.4440 4.3 4.5440
EL and Former EL--31---31-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0390 3.8 2.63925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.2 21.5930 1.0 3.2930
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.4 42.31370 1.4 3.61370
High needs 33.8 31.6760 2.9 6.6760
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.8 27.3440 2.2 6.8440
EL and Former EL--31---31-
Students w/ disabilities 11.5 17.93925 7.7 12.8390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.5 44.1930 1.9 4.3930
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 41.9 27.1480 4.7 2.14825
High needs--26---26-
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.1 36.4330 5.9 0.03325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 60.0 54.0 -6.0 51.0No9375On Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 65.0 56.5 -8.5 51.0No4875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 64.5 63.0 -1.5 51.0No29100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-17--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 60.0 55.0 -5.0 51.0No6275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 72.0 44.5 -27.5 51.0No9450Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 70.0 37.0 -33.0 51.0No4925Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51 70.0 35.5 -34.5 51.0No3025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 72.0 47.0 -25.0 51.0No6350Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 92.0 60.03325
High needs 92.0 60.03325
EL and Former EL 92.0 60.033-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14414299Yes14414299Yes494898Yes
High needs828199Yes828199Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4949100Yes4949100Yes18---
EL and Former EL3333100Yes3333100Yes5---
Students w/ disabilities414098Yes414098Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---2---
Afr. Amer./Black16---16---3---
Hispanic/Latino20---20---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White999798Yes999798Yes343397Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles