Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ipswich High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Ipswich High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ipswich (01440000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Ipswich High (01440505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-14-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement14-14-
Achievement total51247.551267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total0810.00410.0
Weighted total5.310.7-4.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 50%-40%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4847.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total91220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total4.88.8-
Percentage of possible points 55%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage55%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 62

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 97.2 -1.8 100.0 1341No Change
Lowest Performing 96.6 94.5 -2.1 98.4 321No Change
High needs 93.8 87.9 -5.9 95.8 310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 97.5 -1.3 100.0 1214Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 95.3 0.5 96.5 1343Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.9 84.1 2.2 84.7 333Met Target
High needs 73.8 84.7 10.9 75.9 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.2 96.3 2.1 95.8 1213Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 96.0 -0.2 97.9 1311No Change
Lowest Performing 87.1 86.4 -0.7 91.4 331No Change
High needs---- 29--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.4 96.0 -0.4 98.2 1191No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.7 50.0 1263Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.9 50.0 312Below Target
High needs 54.8 50.0 263Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.5 50.0 1143Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.0 50.0 1272Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.8 50.0 321Below Target
High needs 43.1 50.0 272Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.7 50.0 1143Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.7 97.5 2.8 97.0 1583Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.3 91.5 0.2 95.4 472Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.8 97.2 1.4 97.9 1453Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 96.2 -3.1 100.0 1313Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 97.9 95.7 -2.2 100.0 463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 97.5 -1.8 100.0 1203Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 5373Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 974Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 4873Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.5 9.9 -1.4 7.4 5140Declined
Lowest Performing 10.3 15.2 -4.9 3.7 330Declined
High needs 13.9 26.6 -12.7 11.5 1090Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 54--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 53--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 9.1 10.0 -0.9 7.9 4590Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.9 59.3 -3.6 68.6 2360Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 42.9 25.0 -17.9 51.4 400Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 62.1 57.3 -4.8 67.4 2130Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 136 13398Yes 1 136 13499Yes 1 136 136100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 32 3096Yes 2 32 3197Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 19---- 19---- 19----
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 15---- 15---- 15----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 121 12099Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles