Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Davis Thayer

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

This organization is currently closed.


2018 Official Accountability Report - Davis Thayer

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Franklin (01010000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Davis Thayer (01010035)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
82% - Meeting targets79

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.01410.0
Weighted total7.310.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 71%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage95%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 84

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.0 507.1 -1.9 510.7 1200Declined
Lowest Performing 484.4 492.8 8.4 488.3 204Exceeded Target
High needs 491.8 497.9 6.1 493.4 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 500.1 503.2 3.1 501.7 254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 483.6 490.8 7.2 484.9 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 511.0 507.6 -3.4 512.6 1070Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.4 506.6 4.2 503.6 1204Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 475.3 489.8 14.5 478.1 204Exceeded Target
High needs 489.3 496.3 7.0 490.7 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.7 502.3 2.6 500.7 254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 480.0 487.4 7.4 481.8 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.8 506.9 4.1 504.1 1074Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.5 85.8 5.3 82.7 374Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 15--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.8 87.5 7.7 81.9 324Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.9 50.0 823Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.1 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 52.5 50.0 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.5 50.0 692Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.0 50.0 824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 69.6 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 60.5 50.0 344Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.0 50.0 694Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.0 5.9 1.1 6.0 2053Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.8 5.0 -0.2 1.6 201No Change
High needs 11.3 10.7 0.6 9.3 842Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.5 11.4 2.1 9.3 442Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 10.5 4.4 6.1 7.8 454Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 7.8 5.5 2.3 6.7 1834Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 124 124100Yes 1 124 124100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 50 50100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 8----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 5---- 5---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 108 108100Yes 1 108 108100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles