Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bristol County Agricultural High

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Bristol County Agricultural High

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Bristol County Agricultural (09100000)

TITLE I STATUS
Title I School

SCHOOL
Bristol County Agricultural High (09100705)

GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

REGION
Coastal

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	57%	40%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	47%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	5	12	47.5	3	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	3	8	22.5	1	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	12	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	6	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		6.1	10.7	-	2.3	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		57%		-	22%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		40%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-	1	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	8	12	47.5	5	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	12	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		7.8	10.7	-	4.2	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		73%		-	41%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		57%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	52%	57%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	55%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-
	Achievement total	6	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-
	Growth total	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	12	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	2	8	10.0
Weighted total		6.1	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		57%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		57%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-
	Achievement total	4	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	12	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		5.6	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		52%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		52%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.2	99.1	0.9	99.6	110	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	93.5	96.7	3.2	95.5	30	3	Met Target
High needs	94.7	97.9	3.2	96.6	47	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	100.0	99.3	-0.7	100.0	36	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.8	98.9	0.1	100.0	92	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	93.9	92.0	-1.9	95.6	110	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	77.5	72.5	-5.0	80.2	30	0	Declined
High needs	85.8	85.1	-0.7	88.1	47	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	91.1	91.7	0.6	93.9	36	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.8	93.8	-2.0	97.5	92	1	No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.4	93.4	-3.0	98.1	110	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	88.7	80.0	-8.7	92.2	30	0	Declined
High needs	92.1	89.9	-2.2	94.7	47	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	97.4	92.4	-5.0	100.0	36	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.7	93.8	-3.9	99.6	92	0	Declined

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	39.2	97	1	Low Growth
Lowest Performing	25.0	24	0	Very Low Growth
High needs	37.9	42	1	Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged	39.1	33	1	Low Growth
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	41.9	83	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.5	97	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	39.8	24	1	Low Growth
High needs	45.6	42	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	49.0	33	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	44.5	83	2	Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	106	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	33	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	24	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	104	4	Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	107	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	41	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	31	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	103	4	Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	456	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	146	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	101	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	65	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	420	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.7	8.6	7.9	0.0	455	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	0.0	10.0	10.0	0.0	30	0	Declined
High needs	1.4	13.3	11.9	0.0	166	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.2	15.6	13.4	0.0	109	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	60	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	0.7	8.3	7.6	0.0	424	3	Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	19.0	24.0	5.0	23.4	221	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	8.9	10.9	2.0	16.0	64	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.2	13.7	1.5	19.9	51	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19.8	23.1	3.3	24.8	216	2	Improved Below Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	110	110	100	Yes	1	110	110	100	Yes	1	110	110	100	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	47	47	47	47	47	47	141	141	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	36	36	36	36	36	36	108	108	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	15	15	15	15	15	15	45	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	3	3	3	3	3	9	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	9	9	9	9	9	9	27	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	6	6	6	6	6	18	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	92	92	92	92	92	92	276	276	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms