Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Silvio O Conte Community
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Silvio O Conte Community
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pittsfield (02360000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Silvio O Conte Community (02360105)		GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central		FEDERAL DESIGNATION
Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI)

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low subgroup performance: White
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
63% - Substantial progress toward targets11

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage49%72%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		63%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)		 Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-34-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total81260.07867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-24-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.02410.0
Weighted total6.19.6-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 64%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)		 Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total41260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-14-
Growth total3820.03822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total3.49.6-4.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 35%-62%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage49%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage40%51%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		46%
Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total5.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 51%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage51%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 40%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage40%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
17

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 491.3 493.4 2.1 493.2 1433Met Target
Lowest Performing 474.2 479.5 5.3 479.3 243Met Target
High needs 490.7 492.3 1.6 492.6 1293Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.0 492.3 1.3 492.1 1273Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 481.2 484.7 3.5 483.3 304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 491.3 491.1 -0.2 493.0 281No Change
Hispanic/Latino 489.9 490.6 0.7 491.3 282Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 495.5 495.8 0.3 496.8 262Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 491.2 495.0 3.8 492.7 574Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 484.9 488.0 3.1 486.5 1434Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 462.0 472.1 10.1 465.7 244Exceeded Target
High needs 484.5 486.2 1.7 486.5 1293Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.9 486.4 1.5 486.7 1273Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 472.5 475.4 2.9 474.8 304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 483.3 484.4 1.1 485.3 282Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 482.9 482.5 -0.4 484.3 281No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 488.3 492.0 3.7 489.6 264Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 485.9 490.9 5.0 487.7 574Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.5 56.4 -1.1 60.6 511No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.3 55.6 -2.7 61.6 450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.9 55.7 -4.2 63.0 440Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 24--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 47.2 1022Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 48.1 242Typical Growth - Low
High needs 47.7 922Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.5 912Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 49.1 272Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 44.9 202Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 44.1 432Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.1 1012Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 51.8 243Typical Growth - High
High needs 45.7 912Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 902Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 44.7 262Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 38.2 201Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 45.7 422Typical Growth - Low

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.1 71.4 -2.7 79.5 283Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 28--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 29.0 27.9 -1.1 26.8 2832Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 25.0 20.8 -4.2 20.1 242Improved Below Target
High needs 29.8 29.6 -0.2 27.3 2602Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 29.6 29.8 0.2 26.9 2381No Change
EL and Former EL---- 46--
Students w/ disabilities 29.4 31.9 2.5 25.1 470Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 33.3 29.1 -4.2 29.7 554Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 38.6 32.4 -6.2 34.8 714Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 16.3 27.1 10.8 14.1 480Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 27.1 26.2 -0.9 24.2 1032Improved Below Target

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 149 14899Yes 1 149 149100Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 134 133 134 134 46 46 314 313100Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 132 131 132 132 45 45 309 308100Yes1
EL and Former EL 18 18 18 18 8 8 44----
Students w/ disabilities 32 32 32 32 13 13 77 77100Yes1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3 3 3 3 1 1 7----
Asian 1 1 1 1 1 1 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 29 29 29 29 6 6 64 64100Yes1
Hispanic/Latino 31 31 31 31 11 11 73 73100Yes1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 26 26 26 26 9 9 61 61100Yes1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 59 58 59 59 24 24 142 14199Yes1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles