Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William H Taylor

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - William H Taylor

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
New Bedford (02010000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
William H Taylor (02010135)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage67%66%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
66%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-34-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total51260.07890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34----
Mathematics growth24----
Growth total5820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.01410.0
Weighted total4.69.6-6.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 48%-84%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total81260.06890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total4820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total6.09.6-5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 63%-71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%80%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
77%
Meeting or exceeding targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 80%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage80%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 71%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
82

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.6 509.5 5.9 504.6 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 490.7 500.0 9.3 494.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs 501.8 507.6 5.8 503.0 654Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 502.6 506.8 4.2 503.6 594Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.4 511.4 6.0 506.4 584Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.5 505.0 -0.5 506.8 1001No Change
Lowest Performing 493.1 494.3 1.2 496.8 203Met Target
High needs 502.4 503.5 1.1 503.7 653Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 502.5 503.2 0.7 504.0 593Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.5 506.4 0.9 507.0 582Improved Below Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.7 77.0 -4.7 83.9 250Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 2--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 55.8 593Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs 52.3 353Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.1 323Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 10--
Students w/ disabilities- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 7--
Hispanic/Latino- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 59.6 323Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 41.9 602Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs 42.5 362Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.3 332Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 10--
Students w/ disabilities- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 7--
Hispanic/Latino- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 41.2 332Typical Growth - Low

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.7 85.0 -6.7 93.9 203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.2 9.8 -1.4 9.9 1833Met Target
Lowest Performing 15.0 15.0 0.0 11.5 201No Change
High needs 15.7 13.7 -2.0 13.1 1242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.3 14.7 -3.6 14.6 1023Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 28--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino---- 34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.5 5.5 -3.0 7.1 1104Exceeded Target

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 102 10199Yes 1 102 102100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 66 65 66 66 17 17 149 14899Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 60 59 60 60 16 16 136 13599Yes1
EL and Former EL 17 16 17 17 6 6 40----
Students w/ disabilities 11 10 11 11 2 2 24----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----------
Asian-----------
Afr. Amer./Black 10 10 10 10 3 3 23----
Hispanic/Latino 23 22 23 23 9 9 55 5498Yes1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10 10 10 10 2 2 22----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 59 59 59 59 11 11 129 129100Yes1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles