Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Casimir Pulaski
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Casimir Pulaski
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
New Bedford (02010000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Casimir Pulaski (02010123)		GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal		FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
74% - Substantial progress toward targets58

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage83%68%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		74%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)		 Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-24-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total6.59.6-5.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 68%-68%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage68%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)		 Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total91260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7820.07822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.01410.0
Weighted total7.09.6-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 73%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%66%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		64%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total6.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 66%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage66%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 61%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
60

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.7 504.5 -0.2 505.7 2811No Change
Lowest Performing 479.9 481.3 1.4 484.0 402Improved Below Target
High needs 494.9 495.6 0.7 496.1 1683Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.8 496.6 0.8 496.8 1323Met Target
EL and Former EL 493.3 491.3 -2.0 494.7 380Declined
Students w/ disabilities 483.5 482.0 -1.5 485.0 900Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino 493.7 492.1 -1.6 494.7 450Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 509.0 506.4 -2.6 510.3 200Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.3 507.6 -0.7 509.3 2000Declined

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.6 502.5 0.9 502.9 2803Met Target
Lowest Performing 475.7 482.7 7.0 479.4 404Exceeded Target
High needs 493.1 492.7 -0.4 494.4 1671No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.2 493.0 -0.2 494.7 1311No Change
EL and Former EL 495.2 490.7 -4.5 496.7 380Declined
Students w/ disabilities 481.8 481.4 -0.4 483.9 891No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino 491.7 490.2 -1.5 493.1 440Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 502.2 502.2 0.0 503.5 201No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.2 505.5 0.3 506.7 2002Improved Below Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.0 73.6 4.6 71.2 874Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.9 64.4 5.5 61.7 544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 61.5 63.0 1.5 64.3 482Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 47.9 53.4 5.5 51.3 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.9 77.4 5.5 74.2 634Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.2 1843Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 46.7 402Typical Growth - Low
High needs 49.1 1052Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.8 862Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL 47.7 212Typical Growth - Low
Students w/ disabilities 45.9 562Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 11--
Hispanic/Latino 46.3 302Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 52.6 1303Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 56.9 1853Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 57.6 403Typical Growth - High
High needs 52.6 1063Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.1 873Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL 47.6 212Typical Growth - Low
Students w/ disabilities 52.9 563Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 11--
Hispanic/Latino 42.0 302Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 59.3 1313Typical Growth - High

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.5 67.6 6.1 65.5 713Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 61.5 67.6 6.1 65.5 713Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.1 8.9 -0.2 7.8 4972Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 5.0 7.5 2.5 1.5 400Declined
High needs 14.7 11.6 -3.1 12.1 3183Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.4 14.7 -1.7 12.7 2242Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 13.3 14.8 1.5 10.3 880Declined
Students w/ disabilities 17.6 13.8 -3.8 14.3 1453Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 33--
Hispanic/Latino 13.3 19.0 5.7 9.6 840Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3.4 0.0 -3.4 2.1 294Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.2 7.5 -0.7 6.8 3482Improved Below Target

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 294 29099Yes 1 292 291100Yes 1 90 90100Yes 1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 180 176 178 177 56 56 414 40999Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 144 140 142 141 50 50 336 33199Yes1
EL and Former EL 39 36 39 39 10 10 88 8597Yes1
Students w/ disabilities 100 96 98 97 30 30 228 22398Yes1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----------
Asian 1 1 1 1-- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 18 18 17 17 5 5 40----
Hispanic/Latino 49 45 48 47 16 16 113 10896Yes1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20 20 20 20 5 5 45 45100Yes1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 206 206 206 206 64 64 476 476100Yes1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles