Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Littleton High School

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Littleton High School

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Littleton (01580000)

TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School

SCHOOL
Littleton High School (01580505)

GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

REGION
West/Central

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	79%	66%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	71%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Achievement total	12	12	47.5	5	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.3	10.7	-	4.7	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		87%		-	46%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		66%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	47.5	8	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	11	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	7	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.7	10.7	-	6.8	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		91%		-	66%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		79%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	78%	-
Weight	-	-
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	-
	-

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	-	-	-
	Mathematics achievement	-	-	-
	Science achievement	-	-	-
	Achievement total	-	-	-
Growth	English language arts growth	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	-	-	-
	Growth total	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	-	-	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	-	-	-
Weighted total		-	-	-
Percentage of possible points		-		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		-

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	8	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.3	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		78%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		78%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.1	99.3	0.2	100.0	109	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	97.4	99.0	1.6	99.0	26	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.3	99.7	0.4	100.0	91	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.1	97.7	-1.4	100.0	108	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	96.6	93.3	-3.3	98.7	26	0	Declined
High needs	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.0	98.3	-0.7	100.0	90	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.4	97.8	0.4	99.1	104	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	92.2	91.3	-0.9	94.5	26	1	No Change
High needs	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.6	97.4	-0.2	99.3	87	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	45.1	101	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	30.9	26	1	Low Growth
High needs	-	14	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	3	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	42.9	85	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	63.9	100	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing	53.8	26	3	Typical Growth - High
High needs	-	13	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	2	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	63.4	84	4	Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.3	97.2	-1.1	99.4	109	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.1	99.0	0.9	99.5	100	4	Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	100.0	99.2	-0.8	100.0	118	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	30	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	100.0	99.1	-0.9	100.0	106	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.0	0.4	0.4	1.0	463	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	95	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	80	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	0.0	0.5	0.5	1.0	407	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	8.5	5.8	-2.7	7.4	447	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	24.1	3.8	-20.3	20.1	26	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	93	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	67	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	8.5	6.3	-2.2	7.1	383	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.3	74.4	-23.9	100.0	227	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	54	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	43	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	98.0	74.6	-23.4	100.0	197	0	Declined

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	111	111	100	Yes	1	110	110	100	Yes	1	110	109	99	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	16	16	15	15	15	14	46	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	3	3	2	2	2	2	7	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	14	14	13	13	13	12	40	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Asian	11	11	11	11	11	11	33	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	4	4	4	4	4	3	12	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	3	3	3	3	3	9	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	92	92	91	91	91	91	274	274	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms