Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lee Academy

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Lee Academy

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lee Academy (00350001)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage-1%
Weight0%100%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
1%
Limited or no progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04----
Mathematics achievement04----
Science achievement------
Achievement total0880.0---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.0---
Weighted total0.17.2----
Percentage of possible points 1%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage1%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage-41%
Weight0%100%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
41%
Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total3890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total3.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 41%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage41%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 491.1 485.1 -6.0 492.1 490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 487.8 485.6 -2.2 489.2 440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.1 483.7 -3.4 488.1 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 488.4 488.8 0.4 489.9 292Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 486.6 483.8 -2.8 488.2 490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 484.1 485.2 1.1 485.6 443Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.5 483.7 -0.8 485.6 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 482.3 486.2 3.9 484.6 294Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students----
Lowest Performing----
High needs----
Econ. Disadvantaged----
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White----

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students----
Lowest Performing----
High needs----
Econ. Disadvantaged----
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White----

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.4 33.3 -11.1 46.6 390Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 39--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 28.5 28.5 0.0 27.0 1231No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 33.6 29.6 -4.0 31.2 1084Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.2 32.5 -5.7 35.0 774Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 51--
Students w/ disabilities---- 31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black 25.3 25.8 0.5 21.7 621No Change
Hispanic/Latino---- 46--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 3--

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1-----

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 46 46 46 46-- 92 92100Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 40 40 40 40-- 80 80100Yes1
EL and Former EL 20 20 20 20-- 40 40100Yes1
Students w/ disabilities 12 12 12 12-- 24----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----------
Asian 3 3 3 3-- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 29 29 29 29-- 58 58100Yes1
Hispanic/Latino 18 18 18 18-- 36----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 1 1 1 1-- 2----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles