Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bellingham High School

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Bellingham High School

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Bellingham (00250000)

TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School

SCHOOL
Bellingham High School (00250505)

GRADES SERVED
08,09,10,11,12

REGION
Coastal

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Moderate progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
47% - Moderate progress toward targets	43

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	63%	37%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	47%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	2	4	-	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	67.5	6	8	67.5	4	12	47.5	0	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	0	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	1	4	-	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	1	8	22.5	3	8	22.5	1	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	0	4	10.0	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		8.6	10.3	-	4.3	7.6	-	5.3	10.7	-	0.6	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		84%		-	57%		-	50%		-	6%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		70% Weight of non-high school results:22%						28% Weight of high school results:78%
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		37%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	0	12	67.5	0	8	67.5	10	12	47.5	11	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	1	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	3	8	22.5	5	8	22.5	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	3	4	10.0	4	4	10.0	5	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		1.2	10.3	-	1.1	7.6	-	7.6	10.7	-	8.1	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		12%		-	14%		-	71%		-	79%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		13% Weight of non-high school results:20%						75% Weight of high school results:80%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		63%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	63%	34%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	46%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	67.5	0	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	7	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.3	10.3	-	2.2	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		81%		-	21%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		81% Weight of non-high school results:22%			21% Weight of high school results:78%
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		34%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	0	12	67.5	11	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	3	8	22.5	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	6	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		1.1	10.3	-	8.1	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		11%		-	76%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		11% Weight of non-high school results:20%			76% Weight of high school results:80%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		63%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	492.9	494.7	1.8	493.9	159	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	468.0	471.5	3.5	472.1	41	2	Improved Below Target
High needs	476.5	481.5	5.0	477.7	44	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	481.3	489.7	8.4	482.3	25	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	493.1	494.5	1.4	494.1	143	3	Met Target

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.1	97.8	-1.3	100.0	146	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	96.3	92.6	-3.7	98.3	34	0	Declined
High needs	98.9	93.5	-5.4	100.0	50	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	98.0	96.3	-1.7	100.0	27	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.0	97.4	-1.6	100.0	127	1	No Change

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	496.8	498.7	1.9	498.1	158	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	475.9	481.2	5.3	479.6	41	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	484.2	488.7	4.5	485.5	43	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	486.7	491.7	5.0	488.2	25	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	497.4	498.5	1.1	498.9	142	3	Met Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.9	86.0	-8.9	96.6	146	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	78.0	54.4	-23.6	80.7	34	0	Declined
High needs	87.2	70.0	-17.2	89.5	50	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	95.7	79.6	-16.1	98.5	27	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.8	86.2	-8.6	96.5	127	0	Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	69.9	72.0	2.1	72.1	158	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	51.8	55.8	4.0	54.6	43	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	56.3	59.0	2.7	59.1	25	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	70.8	72.5	1.7	73.1	142	3	Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.8	90.5	-5.3	97.5	139	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	86.0	69.1	-16.9	89.5	34	0	Declined
High needs	91.5	78.3	-13.2	94.1	45	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.6	85.4	-11.2	99.4	24	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.7	90.2	-5.5	97.6	120	0	Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.2	155	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	22.1	41	0	Very Low Growth
High needs	34.3	41	1	Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged	42.3	23	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	45.2	140	2	Typical Growth - Low

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	48.2	139	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	34.7	33	1	Low Growth
High needs	43.8	45	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	40.4	25	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	49.0	121	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	51.8	154	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	39.5	41	1	Low Growth
High needs	51.4	40	3	Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged	48.2	23	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	51.6	139	3	Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	34.7	138	1	Low Growth
Lowest Performing	23.4	33	0	Very Low Growth
High needs	25.9	44	0	Very Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.4	24	0	Very Low Growth
EL and Former EL	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	35.4	120	1	Low Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.8	95.2	2.4	94.6	124	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	88.1	92.6	4.5	91.5	54	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	90.9	91.4	0.5	95.4	35	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.4	95.3	0.9	96.2	106	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.5	97.8	0.3	99.2	139	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	98.5	98.3	-0.2	100.0	59	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	98.0	97.7	-0.3	100.0	44	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.9	99.2	1.3	99.7	124	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.5	0.5	0.0	1.0	582	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.6	1.6	1.0	1.0	187	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.2	2.1	0.9	1.1	97	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	107	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.6	0.2	-0.4	1.0	506	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	7.1	10.9	3.8	5.8	165	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	9.8	19.5	9.7	6.3	41	0	Declined
High needs	15.9	25.0	9.1	13.3	48	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.6	37.5	16.9	16.9	24	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.6	10.1	4.5	4.2	148	0	Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	18.9	17.6	-1.3	17.6	592	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	38.2	26.5	-11.7	33.4	34	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	26.8	28.8	2.0	24.5	198	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	28.9	30.5	1.6	24.3	95	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	115	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19.4	17.8	-1.6	18.0	517	3	Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	67.3	72.9	5.6	71.7	284	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	45.9	54.0	8.1	53.0	87	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.0	61.2	10.2	58.7	49	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	46	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	66.3	72.2	5.9	71.3	252	3	Met Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	314	314	100	Yes	1	313	313	100	Yes	1	313	313	100	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	101	101	100	100	100	100	301	301	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	55	55	55	55	55	55	165	165	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	9	9	9	9	9	9	27	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	62	62	61	61	61	61	184	184	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	10	10	10	10	10	30	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	14	14	14	14	14	14	42	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	8	8	8	8	8	8	24	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	6	6	6	6	6	18	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	276	276	275	275	275	275	826	826	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms