Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bay Path Regional Vocational Technical High School

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Bay Path Regional Vocational Technical High School

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational Technical (08760000)

TITLE I STATUS
Title I School

SCHOOL
Bay Path Regional Vocational Technical High School (08760605)

GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

REGION
West/Central

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Substantial progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
53% - Substantial progress toward targets	49

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	73%	39%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	53%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	4	12	47.5	3	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		5.3	10.7	-	2.9	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		50%		-	28%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		39%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	47.5	9	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	3	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		8.2	10.7	-	7.0	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		77%		-	68%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		73%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	72%	24%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	43%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-
	Achievement total	1	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	3	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-
	Additional indicators total	6	8	10.0
Weighted total		2.6	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		24%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		24%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	2	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	8	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		7.7	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		72%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		72%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.6	98.7	0.1	100.0	280	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	95.0	96.1	1.1	97.0	70	3	Met Target
High needs	97.1	96.8	-0.3	99.0	103	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	97.8	99.3	1.5	100.0	72	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	93.1	93.1	0.0	95.0	47	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	97.8	99.3	1.5	99.7	36	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.6	98.5	-0.1	100.0	238	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.1	89.2	-2.9	93.8	279	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	70.1	63.2	-6.9	72.8	70	0	Declined
High needs	87.1	77.7	-9.4	89.4	102	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	89.5	85.2	-4.3	92.3	71	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	75.7	60.3	-15.4	78.3	46	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	87.0	84.0	-3.0	90.2	36	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	92.7	89.7	-3.0	94.4	237	0	Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	93.6	90.5	-3.1	95.3	277	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	78.7	72.1	-6.6	82.2	70	0	Declined
High needs	89.5	82.9	-6.6	92.1	101	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	91.8	85.1	-6.7	94.6	72	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	78.5	75.0	-3.5	81.2	45	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	91.3	86.8	-4.5	94.4	36	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.2	90.9	-3.3	96.1	235	0	Declined

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	45.1	256	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	35.5	61	1	Low Growth
High needs	42.4	95	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	43.6	69	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	41.5	42	2	Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	50.7	35	3	Typical Growth - High
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	44.1	215	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	49.8	254	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	31.0	60	1	Low Growth
High needs	43.9	93	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	46.8	68	2	Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	35.8	40	1	Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	47.5	35	2	Typical Growth - Low
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	50.1	213	3	Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.6	95.3	-0.3	97.4	256	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	93.2	90.7	-2.5	96.6	118	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	92.1	90.8	-1.3	96.6	98	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	91.3	87.5	-3.8	97.0	40	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.8	94.8	-1.0	97.6	231	0	Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.8	97.2	1.4	97.5	248	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	94.8	95.5	0.7	98.7	132	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.1	94.7	-1.4	100.0	114	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	94.9	95.7	0.8	100.0	46	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.5	97.0	1.5	97.3	236	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.4	0.9	0.5	1.0	1,123	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.7	1.8	1.1	1.0	392	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.0	2.4	1.4	1.0	290	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.6	0.6	0.0	1.0	156	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	103	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.4	0.9	0.5	1.0	990	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	7.7	7.9	0.2	6.4	1,140	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	9.0	1.4	-7.6	4.2	70	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	12.7	11.5	-1.2	10.4	409	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.7	13.4	-2.3	11.1	261	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	11.6	10.5	-1.1	8.0	162	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.6	7.3	-3.3	6.8	110	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.5	7.9	0.4	6.1	991	3	Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	51.2	67.7	16.5	55.6	524	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	39.5	61.6	22.1	46.6	177	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	42.8	64.7	21.9	50.5	136	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	28.6	49.2	20.6	36.0	61	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	33.3	51.1	17.8	39.8	45	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	53.7	69.9	16.2	58.7	458	4	Exceeded Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	282	281	100	Yes	1	281	280	100	Yes	1	282	282	100	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	104	104	103	103	104	104	311	311	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	72	72	71	71	72	72	215	215	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	48	48	47	47	48	48	143	143	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	2	2	2	2	2	6	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	36	36	36	36	36	36	108	108	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	4	4	4	4	4	12	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	240	239	239	238	240	240	719	717	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms