Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gr New Bedford Vocational Technical

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Gr New Bedford Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical (08250000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I School
SCHOOL Gr New Bedford Vocational Technical (08250605)	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12
REGION Coastal	FEDERAL DESIGNATION -

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
78% - Meeting targets	61

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	40.0	12	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	20.0	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	1	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	3	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	2	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	8	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		6.8	10.0	-	9.0	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		68%		-	87%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		78%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	2	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	6	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-
	Additional indicators total	7	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.3	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		78%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		78%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		82

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.5	99.1	1.6	99.2	547	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	91.0	97.0	6.0	93.7	135	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	95.7	98.7	3.0	97.9	288	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.6	99.2	2.6	98.4	248	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	88.6	96.7	8.1	91.6	23	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	89.6	95.8	6.2	92.6	66	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	97.5	99.0	1.5	100.0	49	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	96.0	98.6	2.6	98.0	89	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.0	99.2	1.2	99.8	384	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.7	94.8	2.1	94.9	547	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	73.2	80.2	7.0	75.7	134	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	89.1	92.6	3.5	91.5	289	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	92.1	94.0	1.9	94.6	249	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	78.6	84.8	6.2	83.7	23	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	75.4	82.2	6.8	79.2	66	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	90.0	93.9	3.9	94.9	49	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	89.7	94.7	5.0	92.9	90	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.9	95.2	1.3	95.6	383	3	Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	89.0	91.3	2.3	91.5	530	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	66.9	73.1	6.2	69.9	134	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	84.2	88.0	3.8	86.5	276	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	87.4	90.4	3.0	90.3	236	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	69.5	72.3	2.8	72.7	65	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	88.5	90.6	2.1	91.7	45	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	82.5	89.2	6.7	86.5	86	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	91.1	92.1	1.0	93.6	376	2	Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	50.4	50.0	475	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	44.5	50.0	119	2	Below Target
High needs	49.5	50.0	250	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	49.9	50.0	215	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	49.7	50.0	61	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	51.9	50.0	36	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	50.4	50.0	78	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	50.5	50.0	341	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	56.7	50.0	465	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	49.0	50.0	115	2	Below Target
High needs	57.2	50.0	247	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	56.2	50.0	213	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	59.2	50.0	60	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	54.4	50.0	33	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	56.9	50.0	78	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	56.7	50.0	335	3	Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	93.2	89.8	-3.4	97.0	539	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	91.7	87.5	-4.2	95.8	368	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	91.2	87.1	-4.1	96.1	341	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	89.4	76.1	-13.3	98.3	71	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	93.2	92.5	-0.7	99.5	53	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	90.8	83.0	-7.8	95.9	112	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.7	92.0	-1.7	97.5	350	0	Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.3	94.3	2.0	95.4	528	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	89.4	93.5	4.1	94.1	339	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	88.8	93.1	4.3	93.7	319	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	88.4	91.5	3.1	95.2	47	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	94.7	93.2	-1.5	99.5	59	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	89.0	93.4	4.4	94.5	76	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.2	94.8	1.6	96.1	383	2	Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	1.9	1.9	0.0	1.7	2,154	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	3.2	2.5	0.7	2.9	974	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.1	2.5	0.6	2.8	795	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	1.7	3.3	-1.6	1.5	61	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	5.1	2.9	2.2	4.6	243	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	1.5	1.6	-0.1	1.4	188	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	2.4	3.5	-1.1	2.2	429	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	77	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.7	1.5	0.2	1.5	1,437	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.2	34.4	-9.8	38.7	64	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	44.2	34.4	-9.8	38.7	64	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	7.2	5.9	1.3	4.8	2,161	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	4.3	11.9	-7.6	0.0	135	0	Declined
High needs	10.1	7.8	2.3	6.9	1,103	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.3	9.6	1.7	8.0	791	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	9.1	6.8	2.3	4.1	117	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	7.4	7.8	-0.4	3.9	231	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6.9	5.1	1.8	2.5	176	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	8.6	6.9	1.7	4.7	466	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	83	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.6	5.5	1.1	3.4	1,407	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	41.4	79.0	37.6	47.5	1,033	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	30.4	65.3	34.9	36.7	455	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	33.5	68.1	34.6	40.0	379	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	18.4	56.9	38.5	22.6	58	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	14.4	47.7	33.3	20.4	107	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	41.0	79.5	38.5	50.2	83	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	38.9	78.0	39.1	46.4	223	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	42.4	78.8	36.4	49.1	676	4	Exceeded Target

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	551	550	100	Yes	1	551	550	100	Yes	1	551	550	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	290	289	100	Yes	1	290	290	100	Yes	1	290	290	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	250	249	100	Yes	1	250	250	100	Yes	1	250	250	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	23	23	100	Yes	1	23	23	100	Yes	1	23	23	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	66	66	100	Yes	1	66	66	100	Yes	1	66	66	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	50	50	100	Yes	1	50	50	100	Yes	1	50	50	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	90	89	99	Yes	1	90	90	100	Yes	1	90	90	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	20	20	100	Yes	1	20	20	100	Yes	1	20	20	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	386	386	100	Yes	1	386	385	100	Yes	1	386	385	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms