Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Luther Burbank Middle School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Luther Burbank Middle School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Nashoba (07250000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Luther Burbank Middle School (07250305)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.03410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-7.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 79%-99%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement---
Achievement total6867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 69

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.1 513.9 3.8 511.8 2404Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.8 492.8 5.0 491.7 334Exceeded Target
High needs 493.2 496.6 3.4 494.8 764Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 503.0 501.1 -1.9 504.6 390Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 487.0 489.8 2.8 488.3 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 510.6 514.8 4.2 512.2 2064Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 513.4 509.6 -3.8 514.6 2393Met Target
Lowest Performing 488.7 494.2 5.5 491.5 334Exceeded Target
High needs 494.9 495.4 0.5 496.3 752Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.4 498.9 3.5 496.4 384Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 491.8 491.2 -0.6 493.6 510Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 514.3 510.1 -4.2 515.6 2063Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.0 86.6 0.6 88.2 803Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 86.6 87.9 1.3 88.7 683Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.4 50.0 2263Met Target
Lowest Performing 66.9 50.0 334Exceeded Target
High needs 51.2 50.0 633Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.8 50.0 313Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 52.0 50.0 403Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 58.3 50.0 1993Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.5 50.0 2253Met Target
Lowest Performing 62.2 50.0 324Exceeded Target
High needs 55.4 50.0 623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.7 50.0 313Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 50.0 383Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 59.0 50.0 1993Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.3 9.1 -6.8 1.3 2520Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 3.0 -3.0 0.0 333Met Target
High needs 4.1 18.6 -14.5 2.1 860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.7 33.3 -24.6 4.5 420Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 19.6 -15.8 1.1 560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 2.2 8.0 -5.8 1.1 2130Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 245 244100Yes 1 245 244100Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 80 7999Yes 1 80 7999Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 42 42100Yes 1 42 4198Yes 1 13----
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 53 53100Yes 1 53 5298Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 6---- 6---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 2----
White 209 208100Yes 1 209 209100Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles