Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Buckland-Shelburne Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Buckland-Shelburne Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Mohawk Trail (07170000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Buckland-Shelburne Regional (07170005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
55% - Partially meeting targets50

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement04----
Science achievement------
Achievement total4867.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34----
Mathematics growth24----
Growth total5822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.0---
Weighted total4.27.6----
Percentage of possible points 55%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage55%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total4.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 53%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage53%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 67

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.1 503.5 5.4 499.6 1094Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 492.2 500.2 8.0 494.0 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.4 503.9 9.5 495.7 444Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 487.8 490.2 2.4 489.6 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.7 503.7 6.0 499.4 1024Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.9 495.8 -1.1 498.4 1100Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 490.8 489.6 -1.2 492.4 590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.8 493.3 0.5 493.8 453Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 485.9 480.0 -5.9 487.7 260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.5 496.0 -0.5 498.2 1031No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students---- 29--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 15--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 29--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.4 50.0 743Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs 55.1 50.0 423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.1 50.0 303Met Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.6 50.0 693Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.2 50.0 762Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 43.0 50.0 442Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 50.0 322Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 36.0 50.0 201Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 43.4 50.0 712Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.0 4.7 4.3 7.7 1924Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 9.7 8.1 1.6 7.4 992Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.7 9.1 3.6 9.6 663Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 4.7 5.1 -0.4 0.9 391No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.0 4.0 4.0 6.3 1774Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 121 11898Yes 1 121 11998Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 66 6497Yes 1 66 6598Yes 1 18----
Econ. Disadvantaged 52 5096Yes 1 52 5198Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 4---- 4---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 114 11197Yes 1 114 11298Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles