Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lincoln-Sudbury (06950000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High (06950505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-04-
Science achievement34-04-
Achievement total111247.541267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-04-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.04410.0
Weighted total9.010.7-3.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 84%-35%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage60%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth04-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total2810.0
Weighted total4.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 45%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 84

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.9 99.6 -0.3 100.0 3514Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.5 98.2 -1.3 100.0 854Exceeded Target
High needs 99.6 98.3 -1.3 100.0 734Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 99.5 98.3 -1.2 100.0 594Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 99.7 -0.1 100.0 2844Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 98.3 -1.2 100.0 3514Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.0 93.2 -4.8 100.0 880Declined
High needs 97.2 92.8 -4.4 99.4 730Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 96.2 91.9 -4.3 99.2 593Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 100.0 97.5 -2.5 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 98.9 -0.4 100.0 2834Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 96.8 -0.9 99.1 3393Met Target
Lowest Performing 92.2 88.9 -3.3 94.3 880Declined
High needs 91.9 88.7 -3.2 94.2 710Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 90.5 87.1 -3.4 92.8 580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 98.8 100.0 1.2 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 96.3 97.5 1.2 98.1 204Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.4 97.3 -1.1 99.8 2743Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.9 50.0 3201Below Target
Lowest Performing 22.0 50.0 780Below Target
High needs 29.2 50.0 640Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 28.7 50.0 530Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 34.8 50.0 201Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 35.9 50.0 2571Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.2 50.0 3173Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.6 50.0 792Below Target
High needs 52.0 50.0 633Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 52.7 50.0 523Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 66.8 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.0 50.0 2533Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 99.1 0.9 99.4 4364Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.7 95.8 2.1 96.9 953Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 43--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 93.2 94.0 0.8 97.8 672Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 254Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 98.9 0.8 99.5 3694Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 100.0 0.3 100.0 3824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 99.0 100.0 1.0 100.0 954Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 98.6 100.0 1.4 100.0 734Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 22--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 3194Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 1,5653Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 3023Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 86--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.4 -0.4 1.0 2383Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 954Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 68--
Hispanic/Latino---- 66--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 724Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.0 0.1 -0.1 1.0 1,2623Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.9 4.3 0.6 3.9 1,5284Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 4.9 2.3 2.6 0.0 874Exceeded Target
High needs 12.6 11.4 1.2 9.9 3172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 81--
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 11.7 12.2 -0.5 7.8 2461No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 1.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 994Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 70--
Hispanic/Latino---- 71--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4.2 4.4 -0.2 3.2 684Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 4.4 3.7 0.7 3.1 1,2184Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.1 85.3 -5.8 94.3 7563Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 57.8 48.6 -9.2 65.8 1420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 52.5 43.5 -9.0 60.0 1080Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 96.2 98.0 1.8 100.0 494Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 38--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 93.1 78.9 -14.2 96.3 380Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 92.4 87.4 -5.0 95.4 5943Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 356 35299Yes 1 356 35299Yes 1 356 35098Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 76 7396Yes 1 76 7396Yes 1 76 7396Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 22 22100Yes 1 22 2195Yes 1 22 2195Yes 1
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 62 5995Yes 1 62 5995Yes 1 62 5995Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 15---- 15---- 15----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 13----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 287 28499Yes 1 287 28399Yes 1 287 28399Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles