Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Turners Fall High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Turners Fall High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Gill-Montague (06740000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Turners Fall High (06740505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14----
Mathematics achievement24----
Science achievement24----
Achievement total51247.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14----
Mathematics growth14----
Growth total2822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total81220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44----
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total4810.0---
Weighted total4.810.7----
Percentage of possible points 45%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4847.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth04-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total1822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total4.18.8-
Percentage of possible points 47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 13

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.8 92.8 -1.0 95.5 521No Change
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 87.5 85.0 -2.5 89.7 251No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.0 92.6 -3.4 97.8 440Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.9 91.7 0.8 93.1 512Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 82.7 85.0 2.3 85.1 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.2 92.6 -0.6 94.9 441No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 87.5 88.5 1.0 90.0 482Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.5 87.2 -3.3 93.0 410Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 31.2 50.0 491Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 24.4 50.0 230Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 32.0 50.0 421Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.2 50.0 481Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 34.5 50.0 231Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 36.8 50.0 421Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 73.8 87.9 14.1 77.6 584Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.6 81.3 12.7 72.7 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.0 90.4 15.4 78.8 524Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 85.5 76.9 -8.6 88.6 650Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 73.7 72.5 -1.2 78.4 510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 47--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.6 78.8 -11.8 93.5 520Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 5.6 3.1 2.5 5.0 2284Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 11.5 6.0 5.5 10.4 1004Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 78--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 34--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.1 1.0 3.1 3.7 1964Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 30.5 22.9 7.6 28.1 2274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 47.4 40.7 6.7 44.2 1084Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 74--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 25.5 20.3 5.2 22.3 1924Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.3 63.0 -11.3 80.4 1080Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.5 39.1 -15.4 60.8 460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.5 65.3 -10.2 82.2 950Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 56 56100Yes 1 56 5598Yes 1 56 5395Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 29 2690No 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 1995Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 14---- 14---- 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 4---- 4---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 47 4596Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles