Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Groton Dunstable Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Groton Dunstable Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Groton-Dunstable (06730000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Groton Dunstable Regional (06730505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
86% - Meeting targets84

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total121247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.04410.0
Weighted total9.310.7-8.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 87%-84%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total71247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total61220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total2810.0
Weighted total6.110.7-
Percentage of possible points 57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 94

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.9 99.2 -0.7 100.0 1804Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 98.3 -1.7 100.0 434Exceeded Target
High needs 99.2 96.0 -3.2 100.0 310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 99.0 94.6 -4.4 100.0 230Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.9 99.1 -0.8 100.0 1664Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 99.4 0.5 100.0 1794Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.4 98.3 1.9 98.4 434Exceeded Target
High needs 93.0 96.8 3.8 95.2 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 90.6 95.7 5.1 93.6 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.4 0.3 100.0 1654Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.6 98.6 -1.0 100.0 1754Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.8 94.6 -4.2 100.0 423Met Target
High needs 97.7 93.1 -4.6 100.0 293Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 97.9 92.4 -5.5 100.0 233Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 98.6 -1.1 100.0 1634Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.9 50.0 1712Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.1 50.0 412Below Target
High needs 57.9 50.0 273Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 67.9 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.9 50.0 1582Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.2 50.0 1702Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.7 50.0 412Below Target
High needs 57.3 50.0 273Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 63.6 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.4 50.0 1572Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.6 0.4 99.4 2154Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.1 93.8 -1.3 98.3 320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities 92.0 95.8 3.8 96.6 243Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 98.5 0.0 99.9 2023Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 98.6 0.8 98.8 2203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.7 97.6 0.9 99.5 413Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 98.5 0.5 99.1 2023Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.2 -0.1 1.0 8093Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.9 0.9 0.0 1.0 1133Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.1 -1.1 1.0 950Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 47--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.1 0.3 -0.2 1.0 7433Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.1 6.2 -0.1 5.1 7884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 10.9 2.3 8.6 5.6 434Exceeded Target
High needs 13.8 14.7 -0.9 11.1 1290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 15.5 13.6 1.9 11.6 882Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 49--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 0--
White 6.4 6.3 0.1 5.1 7174Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.1 82.5 1.4 84.3 4163Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 40.7 44.8 4.1 48.7 582Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 36.2 41.3 5.1 43.7 462Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 25--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.8 82.5 1.7 83.8 3783Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 183 183100Yes 1 182 182100Yes 1 183 18299Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 9---- 9---- 9----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 11----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 1---- 1---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 169 169100Yes 1 168 168100Yes 1 169 16899Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles