Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Heritage School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Heritage School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dudley-Charlton Reg (06580000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Heritage School (06580030)
GRADES SERVED
02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement14-24-
Science achievement------
Achievement total4867.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total4.27.6-5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 55%-71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage63%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 74

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.6 504.0 1.4 504.1 3263Met Target
Lowest Performing 479.6 486.5 6.9 484.3 414Exceeded Target
High needs 490.9 495.8 4.9 492.5 1064Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.1 499.7 3.6 497.5 704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 483.1 482.7 -0.4 484.8 451No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 496.1 499.8 3.7 497.2 254Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.0 504.7 1.7 504.6 2813Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.5 504.5 0.0 505.9 3261No Change
Lowest Performing 480.9 482.6 1.7 484.5 412Improved Below Target
High needs 494.3 496.1 1.8 496.0 1063Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.5 500.6 3.1 498.6 704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 488.1 481.7 -6.4 490.2 450Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 497.2 497.0 -0.2 498.8 251No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.3 505.3 0.0 506.8 2811No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.6 50.0 1692Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.8 50.0 382Below Target
High needs 43.2 50.0 462Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.4 50.0 302Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 34.1 50.0 201Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.0 50.0 1482Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.0 50.0 1693Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.9 50.0 382Below Target
High needs 49.1 50.0 462Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.6 50.0 303Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 38.4 50.0 201Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.0 50.0 1483Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.1 1.4 2.7 3.0 4884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 414Exceeded Target
High needs 8.0 2.4 5.6 5.6 1664Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.1 3.1 7.0 6.6 974Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 34--
Students w/ disabilities 8.1 4.3 3.8 4.8 703Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino 6.7 0.0 6.7 3.1 414Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.9 1.4 2.5 2.6 4204Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 336 336100Yes 1 336 336100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 111 111100Yes 1 111 111100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 73 73100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 46 46100Yes 1 46 46100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 288 288100Yes 1 288 288100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles