Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Flagg Street

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Flagg Street

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Worcester (03480000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Flagg Street (03480090)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7820.07822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total8.29.6-7.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 85%-97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage91%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total9.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 90%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.8 507.2 1.4 507.3 2233Met Target
Lowest Performing 481.2 489.9 8.7 485.9 384Exceeded Target
High needs 494.9 499.9 5.0 496.5 1134Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.3 497.9 2.6 496.7 544Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 500.8 504.1 3.3 502.8 714Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 479.4 484.1 4.7 481.1 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino 500.2 501.3 1.1 501.3 283Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.0 508.4 0.4 509.6 1602Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.9 501.0 2.1 500.3 2224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.6 484.9 7.3 481.2 384Exceeded Target
High needs 490.8 496.1 5.3 492.5 1124Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.1 494.9 4.8 491.2 544Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 495.5 499.9 4.4 497.7 704Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 480.6 480.0 -0.6 482.7 260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino 492.4 491.0 -1.4 494.0 280Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.5 503.1 1.6 503.0 1603Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.3 84.6 2.3 84.7 523Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.1 75.0 2.9 74.9 203Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.7 88.9 5.2 86.1 364Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.6 50.0 1533Met Target
Lowest Performing 57.9 50.0 383Met Target
High needs 53.6 50.0 743Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.1 50.0 403Met Target
EL and Former EL 53.8 50.0 433Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.9 50.0 1193Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.7 50.0 1534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 61.9 50.0 384Exceeded Target
High needs 64.6 50.0 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 66.3 50.0 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 62.9 50.0 434Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 64.8 50.0 1194Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.0 80.0 20.0 70.2 454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 60.0 80.0 20.0 70.2 454Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.8 2.5 0.3 1.7 3544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 384Exceeded Target
High needs 3.7 4.0 -0.3 1.3 1773Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.8 931No Change
EL and Former EL 3.9 3.5 0.4 0.0 1133Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 7.9 10.3 -2.4 4.6 390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino 4.9 4.7 0.2 1.3 432Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.1 2.4 0.7 1.8 2534Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 227 226100Yes 1 226 225100Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 116 11599Yes 1 115 11499Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 55 55100Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 73 73100Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1 8----
Students w/ disabilities 27 2696Yes 1 27 2696Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 10---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 15---- 15---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 161 16099Yes 1 161 16099Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles