Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Clyde Reeves

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Clyde Reeves

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Woburn (03470000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Clyde Reeves (03470040)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
78% - Meeting targets76

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total101267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total8.310.3-5.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 81%-74%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total91267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total7.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 73%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage73%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 87

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.0 505.9 4.9 502.5 2064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.4 491.8 9.4 487.1 354Exceeded Target
High needs 492.5 498.1 5.6 494.1 774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 500.5 499.1 -1.4 501.9 410Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 485.0 493.8 8.8 486.7 424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.1 506.5 5.4 502.7 1634Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.5 502.8 0.3 503.9 2062Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 482.2 483.8 1.6 485.8 352Improved Below Target
High needs 493.8 494.3 0.5 495.5 772Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.7 494.5 -5.2 500.8 410Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 487.9 488.2 0.3 490.0 422Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.5 504.2 1.7 504.0 1633Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.3 89.5 3.2 88.7 694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.3 80.0 2.7 80.1 303Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.3 91.4 4.1 89.7 554Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.3 50.0 1443Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.3 50.0 353Met Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 553Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.7 50.0 283Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 58.4 50.0 303Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.4 50.0 1133Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.8 50.0 1432Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.6 50.0 342Below Target
High needs 48.9 50.0 542Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.5 50.0 282Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 48.4 50.0 292Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.9 50.0 1122Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.3 3.2 2.1 4.2 3454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.8 0.0 2.8 0.0 354Exceeded Target
High needs 8.3 5.5 2.8 5.9 1463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 4.9 2.0 3.4 612Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 52--
Students w/ disabilities 9.6 9.8 -0.2 6.3 611No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 21--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 30--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 2.3 2.9 3.9 2594Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 215 21399Yes 1 215 215100Yes 1 74 74100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 86 8498Yes 1 86 86100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 16----
EL and Former EL 25 2395Yes 2 25 25100Yes 1 11----
Students w/ disabilities 42 42100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 9---- 9---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 19---- 19---- 9----
Hispanic/Latino 11---- 11---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 167 16699Yes 1 167 167100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles