Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Vinson-Owen Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Vinson-Owen Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Winchester (03440000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Vinson-Owen Elementary (03440025)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total10.210.3-7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 99%-100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage100%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage100%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 99

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 515.1 522.1 7.0 516.8 2394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 494.1 511.1 17.0 498.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 502.9 514.1 11.2 504.5 844Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL 519.0 523.7 4.7 520.4 354Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 493.0 503.5 10.5 494.3 494Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 520.8 529.6 8.8 522.7 454Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 520.4 527.5 7.1 522.0 224Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 513.0 519.1 6.1 514.6 1634Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 520.4 521.5 1.1 521.6 2394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 494.1 507.2 13.1 496.9 394Exceeded Target
High needs 511.5 515.5 4.0 512.9 844Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL 528.3 527.9 -0.4 529.9 354Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 501.5 504.4 2.9 503.3 494Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 533.5 535.0 1.5 535.9 454Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 521.5 520.6 -0.9 523.0 224Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 516.9 518.1 1.2 518.2 1634Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.3 95.4 1.1 96.5 814Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.3 94.4 0.1 96.4 544Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 73.2 50.0 1594Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 74.1 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 73.2 50.0 554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/ disabilities 68.7 50.0 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 83.3 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 72.9 50.0 1094Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 73.6 50.0 1594Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 78.6 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 74.8 50.0 554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/ disabilities 73.3 50.0 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 73.6 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 75.2 50.0 1094Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.5 4.1 -0.6 2.5 3673Met Target
Lowest Performing 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 1.0 2.8 -1.8 0.0 1094Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL 0.0 2.0 -2.0 0.0 504Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 1.7 3.1 -1.4 0.0 653Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 1.4 4.2 -2.8 0.0 720Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 0.0 3.3 -3.3 0.0 303Met Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.7 4.3 0.4 3.6 2532Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 244 244100Yes 1 244 244100Yes 1 83 83100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 88 88100Yes 1 88 88100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 9---- 9---- 5----
EL and Former EL 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1 15----
Students w/ disabilities 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 19----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 166 166100Yes 1 166 166100Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles