Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Abbot Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Abbot Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Westford (03260000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Abbot Elementary (03260004)
GRADES SERVED
03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
78% - Meeting targets87

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total71267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.03410.0
Weighted total6.510.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 63%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total4.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.2 509.1 -1.1 511.9 3620Declined
Lowest Performing 485.9 494.1 8.2 489.8 584Exceeded Target
High needs 498.0 497.9 -0.1 499.6 901No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.9 501.6 6.7 496.5 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 495.3 493.1 -2.2 496.6 580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 516.1 512.7 -3.4 518.0 693Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.8 508.0 -0.8 510.4 2750Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 514.0 511.5 -2.5 515.2 3624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 493.6 497.6 4.0 496.4 584Exceeded Target
High needs 501.6 502.1 0.5 503.0 903Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.6 500.9 4.3 497.6 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 499.4 497.4 -2.0 501.2 583Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 523.8 521.9 -1.9 526.2 684Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 511.9 508.9 -3.0 513.2 2763Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 88.1 -3.2 93.5 1183Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.2 76.9 -8.3 88.4 270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.1 88.7 -1.4 92.2 973Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.7 50.0 2293Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.1 50.0 563Met Target
High needs 50.1 50.0 553Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 44.9 50.0 342Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 51.1 50.0 443Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.5 50.0 1763Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.8 50.0 2303Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.4 50.0 563Met Target
High needs 56.2 50.0 573Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.0 50.0 203Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 52.1 50.0 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 60.4 50.0 444Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.8 50.0 1773Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.5 2.2 0.3 1.5 3694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 3.4 3.4 0.0 0.2 583Met Target
High needs 3.7 1.2 2.5 1.7 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 0.0 3.6 0.9 564Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 1.6 1.4 0.2 0.0 694Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.8 2.5 0.3 1.7 2824Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 365 364100Yes 1 365 364100Yes 1 120 11999Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 90 90100Yes 1 90 90100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 9----
EL and Former EL 13---- 13---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 58 58100Yes 1 58 58100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 69 69100Yes 1 69 6899Yes 1 18----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 5---- 5---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 278 277100Yes 1 278 278100Yes 1 98 98100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles