Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sandwich STEM Academy

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2018 Official Accountability Report - Sandwich STEM Academy

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Sandwich (02610000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Sandwich STEM Academy (02610305)
GRADES SERVED
07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
46% - Partially meeting targets42

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-04-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total41267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth14-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total4.010.3-4.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 39%-53%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total21267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total2.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 23%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage23%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 17

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 503.7 0.8 504.4 4512Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 486.5 482.8 -3.7 491.2 560Declined
High needs 491.7 487.9 -3.8 493.3 1440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.0 497.1 2.1 496.4 654Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 485.8 479.4 -6.4 487.5 970Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.2 503.8 0.6 504.8 4312Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.2 499.7 -1.5 502.6 4510Declined
Lowest Performing 477.9 482.1 4.2 481.5 564Exceeded Target
High needs 488.4 487.0 -1.4 490.1 1450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.5 494.4 1.9 493.6 664Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 482.8 481.3 -1.5 484.9 970Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.3 499.7 -1.6 502.8 4310Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.2 76.9 0.7 78.6 2222Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.5 61.9 1.4 63.3 672Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 68.5 67.7 -0.8 71.4 311No Change
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 50.6 56.5 5.9 53.7 464Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.2 77.0 -0.2 79.6 2151No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.5 50.0 4413Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.0 50.0 562Below Target
High needs 47.3 50.0 1372Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.0 50.0 603Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 44.2 50.0 922Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 6--
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.4 50.0 4213Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 34.9 50.0 4401Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.5 50.0 552Below Target
High needs 35.4 50.0 1381Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.2 50.0 611Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 37.1 50.0 921Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 6--
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 34.5 50.0 4201Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 16.8 14.4 2.4 15.7 4664Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 24.6 19.6 5.0 21.0 564Exceeded Target
High needs 32.6 23.1 9.5 30.2 1564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.9 33.3 4.6 34.4 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 34.1 19.0 15.1 30.8 1004Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 16.6 14.8 1.8 15.3 4393Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 456 454100Yes 1 456 455100Yes 1 225 224100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 147 14599Yes 1 147 147100Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 68 6697Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 97 97100Yes 1 97 97100Yes 1 46 46100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 6---- 6---- 2----
Asian 11---- 11---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 2---- 2---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 434 433100Yes 1 434 433100Yes 1 216 215100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles