Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Randolph High

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Randolph High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Randolph (02440000)	TITLE I STATUS Non-Title I School
SCHOOL Randolph High (02440505)	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12
REGION Coastal	FEDERAL DESIGNATION -

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support Low participation rate: Students w/disabilities -High needs

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
79% - Meeting targets	31

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	40.0	12	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	7	8	20.0	2	4	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	0	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	3	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		6.1	10.0	-	9.0	9.4	-
Percentage of possible points		61%		-	96%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		79%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	0	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		6.8	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		64%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		64%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		49

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	91.7	92.9	1.2	93.2	131	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	81.5	89.7	8.2	83.6	29	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	87.5	89.6	2.1	89.6	77	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	86.6	89.3	2.7	88.2	56	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	86.1	86.3	0.2	89.6	31	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	97.9	96.3	-1.6	100.0	27	1	No Change
Afr. Amer./Black	91.3	90.6	-0.7	93.7	72	1	No Change
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	13	-	-

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	82.3	87.8	5.5	84.2	123	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	48.2	70.0	21.8	52.4	25	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	73.1	83.9	10.8	75.3	70	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	73.4	84.8	11.4	75.8	51	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	71.0	83.3	12.3	74.5	30	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	99.0	98.1	-0.9	100.0	26	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	80.3	84.2	3.9	83.0	68	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	79.8	85.5	5.7	81.6	107	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	50.9	70.7	19.8	55.0	29	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	70.3	82.9	12.6	72.9	60	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	70.3	86.0	15.7	72.6	41	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	70.7	82.1	11.4	74.0	21	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	98.9	98.1	-0.8	100.0	26	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	76.6	79.6	3.0	79.2	60	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	52.7	50.0	100	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	44.8	50.0	21	2	Below Target
High needs	52.8	50.0	52	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.9	50.0	40	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	55.8	50.0	26	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	55.3	50.0	48	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	10	-	-

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	64.6	50.0	96	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	18	-	-
High needs	64.6	50.0	48	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	67.1	50.0	38	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	72.9	50.0	25	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	67.0	50.0	47	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	81.6	79.3	-2.3	83.6	169	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	78.5	76.7	-1.8	82.3	133	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	78.1	79.0	0.9	81.9	119	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	73.3	69.0	-4.3	75.3	29	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	90.6	93.9	3.3	92.6	33	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	81.0	75.3	-5.7	86.7	97	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	89.3	86.6	-2.7	91.3	201	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	87.4	83.2	-4.2	90.5	149	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	86.7	82.1	-4.6	89.9	128	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	83.9	83.3	-0.6	85.9	30	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	42	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	97.3	96.9	-0.4	99.3	32	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	89.5	87.1	-2.4	95.6	116	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	23	-	-

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	1.2	1.9	-0.7	1.1	679	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1.0	3.0	-2.0	1.0	406	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.5	2.8	-1.3	1.4	290	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	1.4	3.3	-1.9	1.3	61	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	131	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	0.8	0.0	0.8	1.0	124	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	0.8	1.8	-1.0	1.0	391	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	74	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	60	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	42.0	51.7	9.7	38.8	60	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	42.0	51.7	9.7	38.8	60	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	27.9	36.2	-8.3	26.0	738	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	41.4	31.0	10.4	35.9	29	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	31.9	43.7	-11.8	29.3	471	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	36.4	47.8	-11.4	32.7	337	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	14.3	31.5	-17.2	6.6	165	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	116	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian	10.9	12.5	-1.6	8.3	136	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black	27.2	39.4	-12.2	23.8	406	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	97	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	30	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	61	-	-

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	57.0	49.1	-7.9	63.1	326	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	46.8	38.4	-8.4	54.8	185	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	50.4	40.4	-10.0	60.7	151	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	56.9	40.0	-16.9	66.3	60	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	45	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	81.9	81.2	-0.7	93.7	69	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	45.5	38.9	-6.6	53.5	175	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	36	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	28	-	-

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	144	140	97	Yes	1	143	134	96	Yes	2	144	140	97	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	88	84	95	Yes	1	87	79	94	No	2	88	85	97	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	63	61	97	Yes	1	62	57	95	Yes	2	63	61	97	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	38	35	95	Yes	2	37	36	97	Yes	1	38	38	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	20	18	90	No	1	20	16	90	No	2	20	17	94	No	2
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Asian	27	27	100	Yes	1	27	26	96	Yes	1	27	27	100	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	82	78	95	Yes	1	81	76	95	Yes	2	82	81	99	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	16	-	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
White	13	-	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	-

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms