Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Silvio O Conte Community

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Silvio O Conte Community

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pittsfield (02360000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Silvio O Conte Community (02360105)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total41260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-14-
Growth total3820.03822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total3.49.6-4.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 35%-62%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage49%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 40%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 21

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 490.3 491.3 1.0 492.3 1572Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 472.3 478.5 6.2 477.6 214Exceeded Target
High needs 490.1 490.7 0.6 492.1 1402Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.2 491.0 0.8 491.8 1352Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 490.9 489.7 -1.2 492.5 250Declined
Students w/ disabilities 483.7 481.2 -2.5 485.5 310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 488.4 491.3 2.9 490.0 324Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 488.9 489.9 1.0 490.6 362Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 491.9 495.5 3.6 493.5 244Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 492.0 491.2 -0.8 494.1 600Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.1 484.9 -3.2 489.9 1580Declined
Lowest Performing 468.2 470.7 2.5 471.5 212Improved Below Target
High needs 487.9 484.5 -3.4 489.8 1410Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.5 484.9 -3.6 489.9 1360Declined
EL and Former EL 491.0 485.1 -5.9 492.8 250Declined
Students w/ disabilities 472.3 472.5 0.2 474.4 312Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 481.8 483.3 1.5 483.6 323Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 488.5 482.9 -5.6 490.1 360Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 489.4 488.3 -1.1 490.9 250Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 491.6 485.9 -5.7 493.9 600Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.4 57.5 0.1 60.3 502Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 55.0 58.3 3.3 58.1 423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.8 59.9 3.1 59.3 383Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 17--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.3 50.0 972Below Target
Lowest Performing 43.9 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 46.9 50.0 842Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.1 50.0 812Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 16--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 52.7 50.0 233Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.8 50.0 392Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 34.2 50.0 981Below Target
Lowest Performing 34.5 50.0 211Below Target
High needs 34.9 50.0 851Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.7 50.0 821Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 16--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 32.7 50.0 231Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 33.6 50.0 391Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.1 74.1 17.0 70.2 274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 57.1 74.1 17.0 70.2 274Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.3 29.0 -9.7 17.4 2860Declined
Lowest Performing 13.6 14.3 -0.7 8.9 210Declined
High needs 20.5 30.1 -9.6 18.2 2560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.9 29.6 -8.7 18.5 2330Declined
EL and Former EL 10.0 34.8 -24.8 6.3 460Declined
Students w/ disabilities 17.1 29.4 -12.3 12.8 510Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 21.3 33.3 -12.0 17.4 600Declined
Hispanic/Latino 11.9 38.6 -26.7 8.5 700Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20.5 16.3 4.2 18.6 434Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 21.8 27.1 -5.3 19.2 1070Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 169 16899Yes 1 170 170100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 151 15099Yes 1 151 151100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 144 14399Yes 1 144 144100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 9----
Students w/ disabilities 34 34100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3---- 3---- 0----
Asian 3---- 3---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 13----
Hispanic/Latino 39 39100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 26 2596Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 63 63100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1 18----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles