Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amvet Boulevard

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Amvet Boulevard

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Attleborough (02120000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Amvet Boulevard (02120007)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
91% - Meeting targets86

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.03410.0
Weighted total8.910.3-7.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 86%-96%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage91%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage95%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 77

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.1 509.2 4.1 506.8 2134Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.5 492.3 9.8 486.4 334Exceeded Target
High needs 492.6 496.3 3.7 494.2 554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 483.7 489.7 6.0 485.0 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.9 508.7 3.8 506.5 1624Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.8 507.4 1.6 507.0 2083Met Target
Lowest Performing 486.3 492.2 5.9 489.1 334Exceeded Target
High needs 491.4 494.7 3.3 492.8 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 483.4 486.8 3.4 485.2 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.6 506.1 0.5 506.9 1602Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.3 93.4 5.1 90.5 724Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 3--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.4 92.5 3.1 91.5 634Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.9 50.0 1353Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.3 50.0 333Met Target
High needs 54.5 50.0 293Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.1 50.0 1113Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.0 50.0 1323Met Target
Lowest Performing 61.8 50.0 324Exceeded Target
High needs 58.0 50.0 283Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.4 50.0 1093Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.7 6.9 -0.2 5.7 3611No Change
Lowest Performing 0.0 3.0 -3.0 0.0 333Met Target
High needs 16.8 13.7 3.1 14.8 954Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 33--
Students w/ disabilities 17.8 3.2 14.6 15.1 314Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 43--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.1 5.7 -0.6 4.0 2650Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 221 220100Yes 1 218 21599Yes 1 75 7499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 61 61100Yes 1 59 5898Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 23 23100Yes 1 23 2296Yes 1 5----
EL and Former EL 17---- 15---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 21 21100Yes 1 18---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 166 16599Yes 1 166 16398Yes 1 65 6498Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles