Massachusetts School and District Profiles

C C Burr

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - C C Burr

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Newton (02070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
C C Burr (02070020)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets88

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111260.07867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.01410.0
Weighted total8.39.6-6.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 86%-82%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 74

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.7 512.9 6.2 508.4 2054Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.1 493.0 10.9 486.0 334Exceeded Target
High needs 493.6 496.6 3.0 495.2 594Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL 500.8 505.9 5.1 502.2 214Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 484.1 487.4 3.3 485.4 344Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 511.8 523.1 11.3 513.7 434Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 493.8 510.4 16.6 495.2 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.1 510.5 2.4 509.7 1194Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.4 510.7 1.3 510.6 2054Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 483.3 485.8 2.5 486.1 333Met Target
High needs 494.4 495.4 1.0 495.8 593Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL 502.2 512.2 10.0 503.8 214Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 484.8 484.9 0.1 486.6 342Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 524.3 524.9 0.6 526.7 434Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 491.4 501.4 10.0 493.3 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.3 507.6 -0.7 509.6 1193Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.5 87.1 1.6 87.7 603Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 4--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.0 86.2 -5.8 94.1 383Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.9 50.0 1323Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.6 50.0 333Met Target
High needs 54.3 50.0 363Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 66.0 50.0 294Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.0 50.0 763Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.0 50.0 1323Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.8 50.0 333Met Target
High needs 43.8 50.0 362Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.1 50.0 293Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.8 50.0 763Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.7 83.3 -2.4 78.2 303Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 85.7 83.3 -2.4 78.2 303Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.2 5.8 0.4 5.2 3292Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 9.1 9.1 0.0 5.9 331No Change
High needs 8.6 13.0 -4.4 6.6 1000Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL 4.1 12.5 -8.4 0.0 480Declined
Students w/ disabilities 11.9 14.6 -2.7 9.2 480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 2.7 2.9 -0.2 0.5 684Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino 9.8 18.8 -9.0 5.8 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.2 4.9 1.3 5.1 1853Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 207 20599Yes 1 207 207100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 60 5897Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 14----
Econ. Disadvantaged 18---- 18---- 4----
EL and Former EL 22 2096Yes 2 22 22100Yes 1 6----
Students w/ disabilities 35 3497Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 44 4398Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 13----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 119 119100Yes 1 119 119100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles