Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Betsey B Winslow

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Betsey B Winslow

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
New Bedford (02010000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Betsey B Winslow (02010140)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
46% - Partially meeting targets39

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-34-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total01260.07867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.03410.0
Weighted total1.39.6-5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 14%-78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total0.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 12%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage12%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 41

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.1 498.6 -1.5 501.6 1630Declined
Lowest Performing 476.5 481.8 5.3 482.0 213Met Target
High needs 492.8 492.1 -0.7 494.6 950Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.9 495.2 0.3 496.2 752Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 22--
Students w/ disabilities 479.2 479.6 0.4 481.0 302Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.7 500.9 -2.8 505.4 990Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.0 495.4 -2.6 499.5 1630Declined
Lowest Performing 475.8 480.1 4.3 478.8 214Exceeded Target
High needs 491.2 488.9 -2.3 492.8 950Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.4 492.0 -1.4 494.4 750Declined
EL and Former EL---- 22--
Students w/ disabilities 477.0 473.8 -3.2 478.8 300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 500.7 496.1 -4.6 502.4 990Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.1 68.2 -3.9 74.8 440Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 24--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 23--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.0 50.0 933Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.3 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 46.8 50.0 532Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.3 50.0 412Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.6 50.0 563Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.8 50.0 932Below Target
Lowest Performing 42.4 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 47.0 50.0 532Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.9 50.0 412Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.2 50.0 563Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.2 80.0 -5.2 78.2 253Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.1 7.6 -2.5 3.8 2630Declined
Lowest Performing 8.7 4.8 3.9 4.8 213Met Target
High needs 7.6 11.0 -3.4 5.3 1630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.6 12.1 -2.5 6.5 1240Declined
EL and Former EL---- 37--
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 16.7 -11.6 1.3 360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino---- 47--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 4.2 6.9 -2.7 2.5 1590Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 164 164100Yes 1 164 164100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 96 96100Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 76 76100Yes 1 76 76100Yes 1 17----
EL and Former EL 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 10----
Students w/ disabilities 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 8---- 8---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 12---- 12---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 18---- 18---- 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 99 99100Yes 1 99 99100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles