Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Howe-Manning

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Howe-Manning

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Middleton (01840000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Howe-Manning (01840005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,03,04,05,06
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement04-14-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total61267.53867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total5.710.3-3.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 55%-47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total4.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 46%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 84

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.5 509.0 1.5 509.2 3763Met Target
Lowest Performing 489.0 491.6 2.6 492.9 702Improved Below Target
High needs 497.9 498.0 0.1 499.5 1062Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 503.1 504.1 1.0 504.7 353Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 493.1 493.0 -0.1 494.4 741No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.7 509.0 1.3 509.3 3303Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.1 506.5 -3.6 511.3 3760Declined
Lowest Performing 490.0 489.6 -0.4 492.8 701No Change
High needs 498.3 495.7 -2.6 499.7 1060Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 501.5 497.5 -4.0 502.5 350Declined
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 494.9 492.3 -2.6 496.7 740Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.1 506.4 -3.7 511.4 3300Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.8 87.9 -0.9 91.0 853Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 78.7 79.0 0.3 81.9 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.7 87.7 -1.0 90.8 773Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.3 50.0 2853Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.9 50.0 692Below Target
High needs 49.7 50.0 782Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.0 50.0 253Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 47.5 50.0 522Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.7 50.0 2483Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.1 50.0 2853Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.1 50.0 693Met Target
High needs 49.6 50.0 782Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.4 50.0 252Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 51.6 50.0 523Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.9 50.0 2473Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.2 3.1 1.1 3.2 3833Met Target
Lowest Performing 2.8 2.9 -0.1 0.0 704Exceeded Target
High needs 9.2 3.7 5.5 7.2 1074Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.7 9.1 5.6 10.5 334Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 8.3 2.7 5.6 5.6 754Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 21--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.8 2.7 1.1 2.7 3344Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 378 378100Yes 1 378 378100Yes 1 86 86100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 107 107100Yes 1 107 107100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 7----
EL and Former EL 15---- 15---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 74 74100Yes 1 74 74100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 16---- 16---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 331 331100Yes 1 331 331100Yes 1 78 78100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles