Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lincoln

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Melrose (01780000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lincoln (01780020)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
83% - Meeting targets86

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total6.89.6-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 71%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total9.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage95%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 95

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.3 511.6 4.3 509.0 1864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.4 494.0 6.6 491.3 274Exceeded Target
High needs 498.2 505.0 6.8 499.8 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.5 507.2 7.7 501.1 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 503.8 509.3 5.5 505.2 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 490.0 494.9 4.9 491.3 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.1 512.8 3.7 510.7 1284Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.6 506.7 -0.9 508.8 1860Declined
Lowest Performing 478.4 485.4 7.0 481.2 274Exceeded Target
High needs 497.8 500.1 2.3 499.2 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.1 500.9 4.8 497.1 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 503.4 506.2 2.8 505.0 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 490.0 491.3 1.3 491.8 333Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.7 507.9 -1.8 511.0 1283Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.5 87.0 6.5 82.7 544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.9 79.2 13.3 69.1 244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 84.0 88.5 4.5 86.1 394Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.2 50.0 1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 52.4 50.0 273Met Target
High needs 56.7 50.0 463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.8 50.0 853Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.6 50.0 1143Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.0 50.0 273Met Target
High needs 55.6 50.0 463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.8 50.0 852Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 82.7 -8.6 78.2 523Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 91.3 82.7 -8.6 78.2 523Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.6 4.9 0.7 4.6 3683Met Target
Lowest Performing 3.6 0.0 3.6 0.4 274Exceeded Target
High needs 10.7 8.9 1.8 8.7 1793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.8 14.5 -0.7 9.6 760Declined
EL and Former EL 6.9 2.4 4.5 2.8 844Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 9.1 -2.8 3.6 550Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 41--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.7 5.1 0.6 4.6 2373Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 190 190100Yes 1 190 190100Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 89 89100Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 12----
EL and Former EL 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 13----
Students w/ disabilities 33 33100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 18---- 18---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 15---- 15---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 130 130100Yes 1 130 130100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles