Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lunenburg High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lunenburg High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lunenburg (01620000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Lunenburg High (01620505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement34-24-
Achievement total71247.561267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-14-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion14----
Additional indicators total5810.00410.0
Weighted total6.810.7-4.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 64%-44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total51247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total6810.0
Weighted total4.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 58

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.4 99.5 1.1 99.8 1014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 95.0 98.0 3.0 96.8 254Exceeded Target
High needs 93.8 97.8 4.0 95.8 234Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.2 99.4 1.2 99.5 904Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.4 93.1 -3.3 98.1 1010Declined
Lowest Performing 90.8 74.0 -16.8 93.6 250Declined
High needs 86.6 78.3 -8.3 88.7 230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.2 93.3 -2.9 97.8 900Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.4 95.5 1.1 96.1 993Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.7 83.0 1.3 86.0 252Improved Below Target
High needs 85.0 84.8 -0.2 87.8 231No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.7 95.5 1.8 95.5 883Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.7 50.0 912Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.0 50.0 221Below Target
High needs 46.6 50.0 202Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.2 50.0 832Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.8 50.0 913Met Target
Lowest Performing 30.2 50.0 221Below Target
High needs 44.7 50.0 202Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.7 50.0 833Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.7 96.0 2.3 96.0 1003Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.3 90.0 6.7 87.4 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.0 98.8 4.8 96.1 864Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.2 96.8 -0.4 98.9 953Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.9 90.0 -2.9 96.9 300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 97.6 0.6 98.8 843Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.5 -0.3 1.0 4333Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.2 2.3 -1.1 1.1 860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 57--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 3803Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.6 7.0 2.6 8.5 4464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 3.3 16.0 -12.7 0.0 250Declined
High needs 22.9 12.8 10.1 20.5 1094Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 55--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 9.4 7.3 2.1 8.2 3994Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.2 64.5 -0.7 70.9 2111No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 21.2 26.1 4.9 29.7 462Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 66.1 67.2 1.1 71.4 1862Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 103 10299Yes 1 103 103100Yes 1 103 103100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 24 2396Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 17---- 17---- 17----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 9---- 9---- 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino---------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 92 92100Yes 1 92 92100Yes 1 92 92100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles